Hello,
I ran into a problematic file that combined two numeric columns into
one:
ATOM325 CA GLU B 40 -30.254 72.432-297.620 1.00
10.00 C
ATOM326 CA ASP B 41 -28.149 73.031-294.529 1.00
10.00 C
ATOM327 CA GLU B 42 -27.716 76.690-295.429 1.
On Nov 8, 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Demian) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ran into a problematic file that combined two numeric columns into
> one:
>
> ATOM325 CA GLU B 40 -30.254 72.432-297.620 1.00
> 10.00 C
> ATOM326 CA ASP B 41 -28.149 73.031-294.529 1.00
> 10.00
On Nov 8, 2007 3:32 PM, Demian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ran into a problematic file that combined two numeric columns into
> one:
>
> ATOM325 CA GLU B 40 -30.254 72.432-297.620 1.00
> 10.00 C
> ATOM326 CA ASP B 41 -28.149 73.031-294.529 1.00
> 1
On Thursday 08 November 2007 17:48, Paul Lalli wrote:
> On Nov 8, 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Demian) wrote:
> >
> > I ran into a problematic file that combined two numeric columns
> > into one:
> >
> > ATOM325 CA GLU B 40 -30.254 72.432-297.620 1.00
> > 10.00 C
> > ATOM3
Demian wrote:
I ran into a problematic file that combined two numeric columns into
one:
ATOM325 CA GLU B 40 -30.254 72.432-297.620 1.00
10.00 C
ATOM326 CA ASP B 41 -28.149 73.031-294.529 1.00
10.00 C
ATOM327 CA GLU B 42 -27.716 76.690-29
Paul Lalli wrote:
On Nov 8, 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Demian) wrote:
Hello,
I ran into a problematic file that combined two numeric columns into
one:
ATOM325 CA GLU B 40 -30.254 72.432-297.620 1.00
10.00 C
ATOM326 CA ASP B 41 -28.149 73.031-294.529 1.00
1
On Nov 8, 3:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Demian) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ran into a problematic file that combined two numeric columns into
> one:
>
> ATOM325 CA GLU B 40 -30.254 72.432-297.620 1.00
> 10.00 C
> ATOM326 CA ASP B 41 -28.149 73.031-294.529 1.00
> 10.00
On Nov 9, 2:09 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Dixon) wrote:
>
> Why have you decided that the OP's solution doesn't provide what he wants,
> snipped it, and offered some code that does something very different?
> and he asked for a more elegant way of doing the same thing. I would have
> thought it wa
if the minus sign always there, then use s/// seems faster than split, like
while(){
s/(\d)-/$1\t-/;
print "$_";
}
On 11/9/07, Paul Lalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 9, 2:09 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Dixon) wrote:
> >
> > Why have you decided that the OP's solution doesn't p
michael wang wrote:
if the minus sign always there, then use s/// seems faster than split, like
while(){
s/(\d)-/$1\t-/;
print "$_";
}
I'm pretty certain the OP wanted the data separated into fields so it
would still have to be split. I do like the idea of adding the 'missing'
space
10 matches
Mail list logo
