On Sunday 27 June 2004 03:06 pm, lfm wrote:
> hello ,beau
>
>
> I have installed bugzilla on the windows, but failed on the linux!
>
> where?
>
> the perl module installation!
>
> I download the perl module from cpan, tar them and
> perl Makefile.PL
> make
> make test
> make install
>
>
hello ,beau
I have installed bugzilla on the windows, but failed on the linux!
where?
the perl module installation!
I download the perl module from cpan, tar them and
perl Makefile.PL
make
make test
make install
But some of them failed !
e.g. DBD-mysql-2.9003
> "Lfm" == Lfm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lfm> since it is a script language ,why not we write the *.pm directly and put to the
lib directory(or other place) .
Quick. Where *is* "the lib directory"?
Yes, that's different on each machine. The Makefile.PL creates a makefile
that knows *pr
> "Beau" == Beau E Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Beau> 2. Even if a module is in pure-perl, the module developers support
Beau> the use of the standard install because it, again, puts the modules
Beau> in their correct places in the perl module tree across all platforms.
And if a script is
On Thursday 24 June 2004 11:09 pm, lfm wrote:
> thank u
>
> Beau
>
> but i am stilled puzzled .
>
> since it is a script language ,why not we write the *.pm directly and put
> to the lib directory(or other place) .
>
> I opened the *.pm and found there are only text .
>
> so ,why we build ?
>
> asp
thank u
Beau
but i am stilled puzzled .
since it is a script language ,why not we write the *.pm directly and put to the lib
directory(or other place) .
I opened the *.pm and found there are only text .
so ,why we build ?
asp need build too?
the really reason that cause me to ask the ques
On Thursday 24 June 2004 09:46 pm, lfm wrote:
> if so ,why we will "perl Makefile.PL;make;make test; make install during
> the installation of the perl module
>
> if not ,why can "perl xxx.pl" be executed directly without any other
> files produce?
>
> i am puzzled, very much!
Yes, perl is a
if so ,why we will "perl Makefile.PL;make;make test; make install during the
installation of the perl module
if not ,why can "perl xxx.pl" be executed directly without any other files produce?
i am puzzled, very much!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
