On Friday, Jun 6, 2003, at 10:04 US/Pacific, Greenhalgh David wrote:
p0: I must confess myself to be a 'perl purist'[1] in
the sense that my stained copy of the first edition
of perl is as trashed as my copy of Sed and Awk.
So I come to the discussion having asked,
"I want to cut over to perl5 f
> "Scot" == Scot Robnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Scot> Word of caution: I tried getting help on IRC (irc.debian.org)
Scot> and found the Perl community there to be much less helpful and
Scot> much more arrogant (if any of you are on this list, I'm
Scot> definitely generalizing, so please t
> basic to the experienced community. I find this list
> to be helpful, too.
> Word of caution: I tried getting help on IRC
> (irc.debian.org) and found the
> Perl community there to be much less helpful and
> much more arrogant (if any
> of you are on this list, I'm definitely
> generalizing, so
e, even if you -have-
RTFM. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Greenhalgh David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:05 PM
To: drieux
Cc: cgi cgi-list
Subject: Re: Difference of $hash, and %hash. (was Getting my head round
hashes)
On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 11:20 pm, drieux wrot
On 6/6/03 at 6:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greenhalgh David)
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 11:20 pm, drieux wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 14:33 US/Pacific, Greenhalgh David
wrote:
> > [..]
> >> My thanks to both of you. The explanation was clear even to me,
> >> much be
On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 11:20 pm, drieux wrote:
On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 14:33 US/Pacific, Greenhalgh David wrote:
[..]
My thanks to both of you. The explanation was clear even to me,
much better than the book i am using to learn perl.
[..]
which book are you trying to learn from?
Se
On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 14:33 US/Pacific, Greenhalgh David wrote:
[..]
My thanks to both of you. The explanation was clear even to me,
much better than the book i am using to learn perl.
[..]
which book are you trying to learn from?
What you may also want to think about, is that an
author of
On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 09:46 pm, drieux wrote:
On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 13:34 US/Pacific, Kristofer Hoch wrote:
[..]
This is possibly the best answer. I won't give any
other.
[..]
why thank you.
there are basically two reasons that one should
be playing with 'just perl stuff' -
On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 13:34 US/Pacific, Kristofer Hoch wrote:
[..]
This is possibly the best answer. I won't give any
other.
[..]
why thank you.
there are basically two reasons that one should
be playing with 'just perl stuff' -
a. they have hashes well done, so if you NEED
This is possibly the best answer. I won't give any
other.
--- drieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 13:07 US/Pacific,
> Andrew Brosnan wrote:
> [..]
> my $hash = {};
>
> while (my $rows = $response->fetchrow_hashref){
> $hash->{$rows->{task_ID}}
On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 13:07 US/Pacific, Andrew Brosnan wrote:
[..]
my $hash = {};
while (my $rows = $response->fetchrow_hashref){
$hash->{$rows->{task_ID}} = $rows;
}
Why is hash declared as my $hash and not my %hash?
and how does the
This creates an annonymous hash '{}' and stores a refe
> >
> > > my $hash = {};
> > >
> > > while (my $rows = $response->fetchrow_hashref){
> > > $hash->{$rows->{task_ID}} = $rows;
> > > }
> >
> > Why is hash declared as my $hash and not my %hash?
> > and how does the
> >
This creates an annonymous hash '{}' and stores a reference to that
David,
I will look it up to be accurate. Give me a bit of
time.
Kristofer
--- Greenhalgh David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Kristofer,
>
> Thank you.
>
> It was a big mistake to forget the method.
>
> I think I still have problems with catching when to
> use $ or %. I don't
> fully understa
13 matches
Mail list logo
