R ; beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] beignet and LLVM 4/5
>
> Such patches were pushed to the 1.3 branch 12 days ago, and appear to work,
> but I haven't yet checked for the bug Fedora had.
>
> If (as is likely) Debian beignet gets asked to switch soon, should I
Such patches were pushed to the 1.3 branch 12 days ago, and appear to
work, but I haven't yet checked for the bug Fedora had.
If (as is likely) Debian beignet gets asked to switch soon, should I use
current 1.3 git? and LLVM 4 or 5?
On 10/09/17 22:26, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
(I'm asking fo
(I'm asking for Debian - Fedora is already using LLVM 4 + git beignet)
On 08/09/17 07:57, Yang, Rong R wrote:
LLVM 5. 0 has been released, we are planning to release a minor release
1.3.2 to support LLVM 4.0 and
LLVM 5.0 after beignet's LLVM5.0 patches are ready.
Roughly how long do you
Rong
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Rebecca N. Palmer
> Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 10:10 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Beignet] beignet and LLVM 4
>
> Debian plans to remove LL
Debian plans to remove LLVM 3.8 and 3.9, retaining 4.0 and 5.0 [0].
beignet 1.3.1 (currently in Debian) doesn't build with LLVM 4.0+, but
beignet git master does.
Fedora tried applying the 4.0-support patches to beignet 1.3.1, but
found that this made several applications crash, and are now u
