I support adoption of draft so that newer IP fabric based encapsulation methods
more commonly used in data-centers(VxLAN) can be applied for L3VPN signaling.
Currently, a subset of L3VPN functionality can also be achieved using
EVPN-based-prefix-distribution( over VxLAN/NvGRE). While EVPN has it
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the
IETF.
Title : Shortest Path Bridging, MAC Mode Support over EVPN
Authors : Dave Allan
Weiguo,
2015-07-24, Haoweiguo:
I will accept your suggestion about allocating UDP
port approach on ASBR-d to save IP address space. However, if the
operators want to use IANA assigned VXLAN fixed port, the IP address
allocating approach maybe still should be used.
Yes, it is ok to say that
Thanks Thomas. I will accept your suggestion about allocating UDP port approach
on ASBR-d to save IP address space. However, if the operators want to use
IANA assigned VXLAN fixed port, the IP address allocating approach maybe still
should be used. So do you think we should provide two option
Hi all,
The major rationale of the BGP Encap SAFI is as follows:
"Since the encapsulation information is coded as an attribute, one
could ask whether a new SAFI is really required. After all, a BGP
speaker could simply attach the tunnel encapsulation attribute to
each prefix (like Q i
Hi Weiguo,
Haoweiguo :
Thomas:
Having to configure as many IPs on ASBR-d as there are PEs in the WAN
seems to me as being a very strong drawback. I think that it would be
better to use a combination of one ore more ASBR-d IP address and
multiple destination UDP ports, to reduce the configuratio
