Jorge,
Understood, many thanks. Now that the default tunnel encapsulation is MPLS
encapsulation, the tunnel type 10 seems to be unneccessary. So is the
introduction of tunnel type 10 just for further removing ambiguity? If i don't
use the tunnel type 10 in MPLS based EVPN implementation(RFC 743
Weiguo,
Well, if an RFC7432 implementation does not use the RFC5512 ext community, the
following sentence in the evan-overlay draft should help interoperability. I
personally don’t see any issues.
If the BGP Encapsulation extended community is not present, then the
default MPLS encapsulatio
Jorge,
Thanks for your explanations. However, i still can't understand, i'm sorry.
RFC 5512 only defines IP tunnel type and encapsulation attribute, like
L2TPv3,GRE and IP in IP. For RFC 5512, MPLS tunnel doesn't need to be defined
specifically, it is default case. In RFC 7432, the tunnel type
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled Services Working Group of the
IETF.
Title : Virtual Subnet: A BGP/MPLS IP VPN-based Subnet
Extension Solution
Authors : Xiaohu Xu
Alvaro,
I will update it ASAP.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:27 AM
To: Xuxiaohu; draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org
Cc: VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN); bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AD Review
The IESG has received a request from the BGP Enabled Services WG (bess)
to consider the following document:
- 'Virtual Subnet: A BGP/MPLS IP VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution'
as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this ac
On 11/10/15, 2:18 AM, "Xuxiaohu"
mailto:xuxia...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Xiaohu:
Hi!
We have updated the draft according to your comments and suggestions.
I just have a couple of small items. Please see my comments below..
I'm going to start the IETF Last Call and put this document up for the IE
Weiguo,
There are already implementations using value 10 in the RFC5512 BGP encap ext
community.
That is the value you would have in RFC7432 compliant networks where you can
also have overlay tunnels. Value 10 would indicate to the ingress PE that the
route needs an MPLS tunnel to be resolved.
Hi Ali & John,
The draft of 'draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-02' describes how EVPN can be used
for Overlay network, the overlay network includes VXLAN, NVGRE and MPLS Over
GRE.
In section 13 IANA considerations, several overlay tunnel types are requested
as follows:
8VXLAN Encapsulation
9
