[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-01.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. Title : Extensions to BGP Signaled Pseudowires to support Flow-Aware Transport Labels Authors : Keyur Patel

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang

Re-send - just in case. I support this draft as a co-author. I am not aware of any relevant IPR. Regards, Iftekhar -Original Message- From: Kishore Tiruveedhula [mailto:kisho...@juniper.net] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 7:57 AM To: Xufeng Liu; EXT - thomas.mo...@orange.com;

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Support for draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang. It is a good start to this model. +1 to Giles comment that the bgp-parameters structure needs to be harmonized draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang. Both draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang and draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang should reference the base bgp model

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Resending due to mail delivery messages Support as co-author Not aware of any relevant IPR Thanks, Tapraj On 5/5/16, 9:43 AM, "Tapraj Singh (tapsingh)" wrote: >As a co-author, I support this draft. > > >Thanks >Tapraj > >On 5/5/16, 7:48 AM, "BESS on behalf of Shah,

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang

Support for draft-bissette-bess-evpn-yang as a start for the yang module. A few questions for the authors: Do you intend to link the definitions of: "typedef bgp-rt-type" to other uses of the RT type? How do you see policy interacting with the RT values in grouping

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Thanks Himanshu, That all sounds reasonable. Adrian > -Original Message- > From: Shah, Himanshu [mailto:hs...@ciena.com] > Sent: 25 May 2016 14:16 > To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Thomas Morin'; bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org > Subject: RE: [bess] Poll for

[bess] draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang is adopted (was Re: Poll for adoption: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang)

Hi everyone, We have consensus for this draft to become a BESS WG document. Authors can you please repost as draft-ietf-bess-evpn-yang-00 with the agreed changes ? Best, -Thomas Thomas Morin : Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Hi Adrian - Appreciate your detail review and the comments. Please see below inline responses to your comments.. Thanks, Himanshu -Original Message- From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 8:52 AM To: 'Thomas Morin';

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang

Thanks Patrice, That works for me as a resolution of this point. Adrian > -Original Message- > From: Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) [mailto:pbris...@cisco.com] > Sent: 25 May 2016 12:27 > To: Adrian Farrel; 'Thomas Morin'; bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-y...@tools.ietf.org >

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang

Thank Adrian for your review. IMO, the merging of both Yang model is not longer appropriate. At the beginning, it wasn¹t clear how both models will coexist. I think both model are orthogonal and having L2VPN referring to EVPN is the right way. I will take out the comment related to ³future

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang

Yes/support -Original Message- >>From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin >>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:18 AM >>To: bess@ietf.org >>Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org >>Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang >> >>Hello