A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : Multicast VPN fast upstream failover
Authors : Thomas Morin
Robert Kebler
Hi Ali,
thank you for taking the time to review and respond during this busy time,
much appreciated. I will upload the updated version of the draft shortly.
Regards,
Greg
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:43 AM Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Greg,
>
>
>
> The changes look good. Thanks for
Hi Greg,
The changes look good. Thanks for taking care of my comments.
Cheers,
Ali
From: Greg Mirsky
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 7:50 AM
To: Cisco Employee , BESS ,
"bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: Proposed updates to address comments to
draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover
Dear Ali,
Patrice,
I think it is much cleaner to treat the attachment of a set of L2GW PEs to an
L2 network as a set of individual ESes, one per L2GW PE, as Jorge suggests.
This is because a remote PE accesses different parts of the L2 network through
different L2GW PEs; i.e., to a remote PE the
Stuart thanks, we also support this but wanted to ensure some things that are
obvious to some people are not for others and hence I believe we have a duty in
IETF to make people aware about these things. Thx
From: Stuart Mackie
Date: Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 19:41
To: "Henderickx, Wim
Hi Wim,
Stephane had alerted me to these comments you made a while ago, but which I
missed at the time. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
* The doc is much focused on the VRF constructions and architecture, but in
some use cases we need to program the SF, which is not always clear
Hi Donald,
-Original Message-
From: Donald Eastlake
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 6:59 PM
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" ,
"draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd.auth...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: Comments about draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-01
Hi Jorge,
Hi Jorge,
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:12 PM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain
View) wrote:
>
> Hi Donald,
>
> Thank you for this.
> For the second question, I get from your answer that you will keep both
> encapsulations for the time being?
Well, once a draft is posted, it can't be changed, so
