Hi Jorge, On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:12 PM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <jorge.raba...@nokia.com> wrote: > > Hi Donald, > > Thank you for this. > For the second question, I get from your answer that you will keep both > encapsulations for the time being?
Well, once a draft is posted, it can't be changed, so the currently posted -01 won't change but the -02 version that is being worked on and is not yet posted eliminates the alternative encapsulation. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA d3e...@gmail.com > Thanks. > Jorge > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> > Date: Monday, November 5, 2018 at 8:48 PM > To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com> > Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, > "draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd.auth...@ietf.org" > <draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd.auth...@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: Comments about draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-01 > > Hi Jorge, > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 4:44 AM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain > View) <jorge.raba...@nokia.com> wrote: > > > > Dear authors, > > > > I couldn’t make it to the BESS meeting, so my apologies if some of > these things have been discussed. > > > > Some comments/questions: > > Thanks for sending comments. > > > - In the last IETF, I suggested the use of BGP and the BGP-BFD > attribute to exchange discriminators, as in section 3.1.6 of > draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover. The idea seemed to be accepted, but it is > not in the new version. This would allow the signaling of the discriminators > along with MAC/IP routes, IMET routes, AD per-EVI routes, IP-Prefix routes, > etc. without the burden of having to support the EVPN LSP-ping draft. > > There is a draft version -02 in the works intended to include > distribution of BFD discriminators in BGP but this revision was not > completed to the agreement of the authors in time to posted before > this meeting. > > > - The draft describes an encapsulation and an alternative > encapsulation. Is the intend to keep both? Wouldn't be better to leave only > one to ease implementations and interoperability? > > Currently, the candidate version -02 draft dispenses with with the > alternative encapsulation. > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA > d3e...@gmail.com > > > Thank you. > > Jorge > > _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
