[bess] EVPN Multihoming and Symmetric IRB

Hi Everyone, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding does not explicitly describe the implications of EVPN multihoming on IRB. It seems to assume that the IRB procedures can be easily extrapolated to multihoming following RFC 7432 and it says so at least for the mobility procedures described

Re: [bess] [BESS] Conflicting rules among the Yang models on the association between IRB/AC interface and IP-VRF/MAC-VRF instance.

Hi all, I find some conflicting rules about interface-to-VRF binding between RFC8529 and draft-ietf-bess-l2vpn-yang-09.txt. Thanks Acee for reminding me to check the changes in the new version of these documents. And I update the original mail as below after the checking:

[bess] Protocol Action: 'Updated processing of Control Flags for BGP VPLS' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-08.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Updated processing of Control Flags for BGP VPLS' (draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-08.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the BGP Enabled ServiceS Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Deborah

Re: [bess] bmwg Digest, Vol 175, Issue 1 (for draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest )

Hi All, Could you please let me know if you have any comments for our draft. Kindly share before WGLC window expires before 30th April 2019. Kindly share your inputs. Regards, Sudhin -Original Message- From: bmwg On Behalf Of bmwg-requ...@ietf.org Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Re: [bess] Poll to progress draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane without implementation

Hi, We have a good amount of support to progress the document with implementations. We (chairs) are now waiting for the next I-D update to move forward. Brgds, From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 19:55 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; Sami Boutros