Hi Christer,
Thanks for your comments.
For your information, this document is just a revision of RFC5549, so 99,9% of
the text is just copy/paste from the existing RFC.
Of course, we can improve things.
I'll take care of your comments for a next revision.
For the IANA section, as IANA will not h
On July 5, 2020 at 1:10:06 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Adrian:
Hi!
> > > DISCUSS:
> >>> -
> >>>
> >>> (1) Controllers and other nodes.
...
> We can, however, make sure that only nodes that are authorised to be
> controllers are allowed t
Thanks Alvaro!
>> "In an environment where there is concern that rogue Controllers might be
>> introduced to the network and inject false SFPRs or take over and change
>> existing SFPRs, it is RECOMMENDED that each SFF and Classifier be
>> configured with the identities of authorised Controllers.
rfc5575bis, when it came out of the WG had a section about error handling
including treat-as-withdraw. As we processed and cleaned the document up
we ended up not defining specific effort handling for FS, but relying on
the behavior for Extended communities already specified somewhere else.
Just
Thanks!
That may explain why we have what we have.
A
From: Alvaro Retana
Sent: 10 July 2020 21:06
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; The IESG
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-pl...@ietf.org; sfc-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on
d
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : Weighted Multi-Path Procedures for EVPN All-Active
Multi-Homing
Authors : Neeraj Malhotra
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : Seamless Multicast Interoperability between EVPN and
MVPN PEs
Authors : Ali Sajassi
