Hi Jeffrey,
Maybe I was confused by the last mail.
Let's discuss it on the basis of the text of the [EVPN Virtual Hub] draft.
In section 7.1, it says that:
In case of IR with MPLS
unicast tunnels, VH1 must advertise different labels to different
PEs, so
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : BGP Control Plane for the Network Service Header in
Service Function Chaining
Authors : Adrian Farrel
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : BGP Control Plane for the Network Service Header in
Service Function Chaining
Authors : Adrian Farrel
Hi Bob,
* *If* the AR REPLICATOR behaviors are removed from that draft,I think the
hub/spoke scenario can't be well supported because that the RRs are widely used.
What do you mean by *if* in the above statement? It is the designed behavior
with hub and spoke scenario – with that do you
Hi Luc,
Thanks for your email.
I think having similar text in the abstract and beginning of the introduction
is not uncommon, especially if it helps people to get the gist of the document
just by reading the abstract.
Nevertheless we can make all the changes that help the readability during the
