[bess] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09: (with COMMENT)

2021-10-18 Thread Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refe

[bess] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: (with DISCUSS)

2021-10-18 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

[bess] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: (with COMMENT)

2021-10-18 Thread Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Pl

[bess] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13: (with COMMENT)

2021-10-18 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please re

Re: [bess] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-12

2021-10-18 Thread Lars Eggert
Matt, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-8-27, at 18:39, Matt Joras via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Matt Joras > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review

Re: [bess] [EXTERNAL] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: (with DISCUSS)

2021-10-18 Thread Alexander Vainshtein
Hi all, I have done the RTG-DIR review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-10 (can be found here). All the issues I have raised in my review have been resolved when the -11 revision of the draft has been post

Re: [bess] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: (with DISCUSS)

2021-10-18 Thread Martin Vigoureux
Hello Lars, Le 2021-10-18 à 13:15, Lars Eggert via Datatracker a écrit : Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-04.txt

2021-10-18 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : BGP Usage for SDWAN Overlay Networks Authors : Linda Dunbar James Guichard

[bess] WGLC Request for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-04

2021-10-18 Thread Linda Dunbar
Matthew and Stephane, We think the draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-04 is ready for WGLC. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/ The document demonstrates how the BGP-based control plane is used for large-scale SDWAN overlay networks with little manual intervention. It

[bess] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09: (with COMMENT)

2021-10-18 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please re