Reviewer: Joseph Salowey
Review result: Ready
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and
Hi Vinayak,
The Bump-in-the-wire with a VLAN-aware BD is just slightly implied in the
terminlogy section of RFC9136.
It is not mentioned in the main body of RFC9136.
So a few critical details are still absent, while there may be already
different implementations up to now,
I think
Parag,
Lots of thanks for your response.
The updates to the draft that you have suggested (in this and previous emails)
look good to me
However, I am not sure your response to my last question really addresses it –
please see inline below.
Regards,
Sasha
Office: +972-39266302
Cell:
Hi Jorge & Yubao,
In the most common use cases an IP prefix route has to be unique with an VRF.
The VPN Label/L3VNI brings in this separation of IP prefixes even for
VLAN-aware bundling.
(With all L2 routes the Ethernet Tag has to be non-zero for VLAN-aware BD for
sure to distinguish BDs).
In
