Re: [bess] WG adoption for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-vpws-seamless

2023-05-24 Thread Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
As a co-author I support the adoption of this document as WG document. Not aware of any related IPR. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS on behalf of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 10:02 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption for

Re: [bess] Questions on VLAN-based/VLAN-bundle Service Interface of rfc7432bis

2023-05-24 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
If you are talking about different VLAN IDs (VIDs) on the same physical interface of an ES is getting mapped to a BD, and the is advertised via Eth AD per EVI route with Eth-tag of zero, then this is VLAN-bundle service interface. In VLAN bundle, it is assumed that the MAC addresses across

[bess] Questions on VLAN-based/VLAN-bundle Service Interface of rfc7432bis

2023-05-24 Thread wang.yubao2
Hi All, I have encountered a use case that I don't know if it's VLAN-based service interface or VLAN-bundle service interface. When two individual subinterfaces on the same ES are attached to the same BD which is the only one BD (whose Ethernet Tag ID is zero) of its EVI, which Service

Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-05-24 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Thank you, Parag, for the changes. As you have seen by now, I have cleared my previous DISCUSS ballot. Regards -éric PS: please accept my apologies for delayed reaction From: "Parag Jain (paragj)" Date: Monday, 8 May 2023 at 19:22 To: Eric Vyncke , The IESG Cc:

[bess] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-10: (with COMMENT)

2023-05-24 Thread Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [bess] Question on symmetric EVPN IRB RFC 9135

2023-05-24 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi Sami, Please refer to my response inline in red … From: BESS on behalf of Boutros, Sami Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 2:31 PM To: BESS Subject: [bess] Question on symmetric EVPN IRB RFC 9135 Hi, Looking at section 5.2, it doesn’t address quite few cases like for example. * What

Re: [bess] WG adoption for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-vpws-seamless

2023-05-24 Thread Krishnaswamy Ananthamurthy (kriswamy)
Support. Thanks Krishna From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 3:02 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-vpws-seamless Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll

Re: [bess] WG adoption for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-vpws-seamless

2023-05-24 Thread Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
Hi, As author, I support this document. I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Regards, Patrice Brissette, Distinguished Engineer, Cisco Systems From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 04:02 To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"

[bess] WG adoption for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-vpws-seamless

2023-05-24 Thread slitkows.ietf
Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-vpws-seamless-07 [1]. Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that