Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

Errata System Subject: Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899) That’s not correct. The service in question assumes that there are multiple VLANs but that a given MAC address is unique across all of them. Hence, one broadcast domain. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2019, at 9

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

That’s not correct. The service in question assumes that there are multiple VLANs but that a given MAC address is unique across all of them. Hence, one broadcast domain. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2019, at 9:16 PM, Luc André Burdet wrote:  7432 makes the clear distinction between

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

- GB) ; slitkows.i...@gmail.com Cc: sean_c...@realtek.com; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899) Hi, I don't understand why this erratum was filed. "Broadcast Domain" is the correct term used in RFC7432 and all the EVPN documents. It should b

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

2019 5:50 PM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: Sean.Chen ; Frank Lu ; RFC Errata System Subject: Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899) 7432 makes the clear distinction between broadcast domain and bridge table (in definitions section no less...) Concur, this erratum 5899 should be rejected. E

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

7432 makes the clear distinction between broadcast domain and bridge table (in definitions section no less...) Concur, this erratum 5899 should be rejected. Erratum 5900 makes somewhat more sense, VLAN Bundle in 7432 6.2 is for multiple broadcast

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

Hi, I don't understand why this erratum was filed. "Broadcast Domain" is the correct term used in RFC7432 and all the EVPN documents. It should be rejected. Thanks. Jorge -Original Message- From: RFC Errata System Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 4:17 PM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia

[bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8584, "Framework for Ethernet VPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5899 --

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899)

I agree Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) > wrote: > > Hi, > > I don't understand why this erratum was filed. > "Broadcast Domain" is the correct term used in RFC7432 and all the EVPN > documents. > It should be rejected. > >