This email begins a two-week WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02 [1].
Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this
document, to ensure that IPR has been disclo
Hi,
As co-author, I support the document for WG adoption. It is important to have
this adopted as soon as possible to make sure all EVPN SRv6 multi-homing
implementations follow the same procedures.
Not aware of any relevant IPR.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Date: Thursday, Septe
Hi All,
I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document.
As a co-author, I would request the WG to support adoption - this updates
the RFC9252 that was produced by our WG and provides clarifications that
were found to be required during the multi-vendor interop.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Thu, S
As a co-author, I support the WG adoption of this document.
I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document/draft.
Thanks.
From: Ketan Talaulikar
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 1:36 PM
To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Cc: bess@ietf.org , draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject:
Support the adoption of this draft.
From: BESS on behalf of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:51 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a two
I support for adoption.
Thanks
Krishna
From: BESS on behalf of "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)"
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 9:51 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bes
-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a two-week WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02 [1].
Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
We are also polling
I support the WG adoption of this draft.
Thanks.
Diego.
From: BESS on behalf of "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)"
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:51 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for d
I support the WG adoption of this draft.
Thanks
Dan
From: BESS on behalf of "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)"
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:49 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org"
Subject: [EXT][bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
I reviewed the draft and it’s important updates to RFC 9252 to support SRV6
BGP service overlay to support SRv6 SID ARG field for endpoint behaviors
that require it namely with EVPN RT-1 and RT-3.
I support WG adoption.
Thanks
Gyan
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:50 AM Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <
matt
I support the WG adoption of this draft. It's an important update for RFC9252
and benifits the implementation.
Regards,
Yao___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Hi WG,
I've read the draft and support this adoption.
Best Regards,
Ran
Original
From: MatthewBocci(Nokia)
To: bess@ietf.org ;
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
;
Date: 2023年09月28日 22:51
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-ar
ietf.org"
Subject: [EXT][bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a two-week WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02 [1].
Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
We are also polling fo
Support the adoption of this draft.
Be well,
G/
From: BESS On Behalf Of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 4:49 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a two-week WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02 [1].
Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed
s,
Regards,
--Bruno
Orange Restricted
From: BESS On Behalf Of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 4:49 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a two-week WG
@ietf.org
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a two-week WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02 [1].
Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
WG,
There is consensus to adopt this draft as a BESS WG document.
Authors: please respond to the one comment form Bruno and upload a new version
of the draft as draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-00.
Thanks
Matthew
From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Date: Thursday, 28 September 2023 at 15:49
To: bess@ie
bly similar comment for §3.2 (“The LBL, LNL, and FL MUST be set to
> appropriate values”).
>
>
KT> Perhaps the word "appropriate" is redundant here ... would removing it
help?
Thanks,
Ketan
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regards,
>
> --Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>
Hi Matthew,
We have just posted the WG version of the draft that is identical to the
one that was up for adoption.
We will post another update after incorporating the changes to address
Bruno's comments after we conclude on the text changes.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 4:10 PM Matthe
Hi Ketan
Thanks. That works.
Matthew
From: Ketan Talaulikar
Date: Monday, 23 October 2023 at 12:07
To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Cc: bess@ietf.org , draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
CAUTION: This is an external email
ss-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a two-week WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02 [1].
Please review the draft and post any comments to
propriate values”).
>
>
>
> KT> Perhaps the word "appropriate" is redundant here ... would removing it
> help?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ketan
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regards,
>
> --Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
> Orange Restrict
>> REQUIRED that the LBL, LNL, and FL values be set as indicated via
>>
>> the SID Structure for the End.DT2M SRv6 Service SIDs.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Given that this is already the second spec to clarify this, may be
>
.org>> On Behalf Of
Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 4:49 PM
To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Cc:
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-s
25 matches
Mail list logo