原始邮件
发件人：Rabadan,Jorge(Nokia-US/MountainView)
收件人：王玉保10045807;
抄送人：bess@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年07月30日 21:47
主 题 ：Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement
Hi Yubao,
For GW-IP overlay indexes, until the PE does not receive at least one RT2 for
the GW-IP,
Which RT-1 route will R5's ESI overlay index be resolved to?
The R1_BD1 or the R1_BD2 ?"
Thanks,
Yubao
原始邮件
发件人：Rabadan,Jorge(Nokia-US/MountainView)
收件人：王玉保10045807;
抄送人：bess@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年07月30日 21:47
主 题 ：Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement
Hi Yubao,
F
zte.com.cn
Date: Friday, July 30, 2021 at 5:01 AM
To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement
Hi Jorge,
In our discussion in another thread, we discussed two types ot the use cases of
draft-ietf
王玉保10045807;
抄送人：bess@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2021年07月30日 21:47
主 题 ：Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement
Hi Yubao,
For GW-IP overlay indexes, until the PE does not receive at least one RT2 for
the GW-IP, you can’t resolve the RT5. If you receive multiple for the same IP
with the sam
21:47
主 题 ：Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement
Hi Yubao,
For GW-IP overlay indexes, until the PE does not receive at least one RT2 for
the GW-IP, you can’t resolve the RT5. If you receive multiple for the same IP
with the same key, it is bgp best path selection. If y
Hi Jorge,
In our discussion in another thread, we discussed two types ot the use cases of
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement,
They are the GW-IP as overlay index use cases (just let me call them
GW-IP-Style use-cases for short) and the Bump-in-the-wire use case.
I think it is
