rg> mailto:bess@ietf.org>>,
Parag Jain (paragj) mailto:par...@cisco.com>>, Luc Andre
Burdet (lburdet) mailto:lbur...@cisco.com>>
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein
mailto:alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com>>, Ron
Sdayoor mailto:ron.sday...@rbbn.com>>
Subject: Re: [bess] Coverage of ER
:par...@cisco.com>>, Luc Andre
Burdet (lburdet) mailto:lbur...@cisco.com>>
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein
mailto:alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com>>, Ron
Sdayoor mailto:ron.sday...@rbbn.com>>
Subject: Re: [bess] Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN
Dear author
;,
Parag Jain (paragj) mailto:par...@cisco.com>>, Luc Andre
Burdet (lburdet) mailto:lbur...@cisco.com>>
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein
mailto:alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com>>, Ron
Sdayoor mailto:ron.sday...@rbbn.com>>
Subject: Re: [bess] Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms
Andre Burdet (lburdet)
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein , Ron Sdayoor
Subject: Re: [bess] Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN
Dear authors of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-09 and
draft-burdet-bess-evpn-fast-reroute-03,
Your help with addressing the following question will be most
Dear authors of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-09 and
draft-burdet-bess-evpn-fast-reroute-03,
Your help with addressing the following question will be most appreciated,
As these two mentioned drafts seem to be under consensus; would not it be right
to address the coverage of ERL label should
