>;
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org>;
bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for your support and comments. Please check inline below for
t;
>>
>>
>> Your proposed changes look good to me.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for this.
>>
>>
>>
>> --Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ketan Talaulikar
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 23, 2023 1:06 PM
>> *To:* DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/N
for this.
>
>
>
> --Bruno
>
>
>
> *From:* Ketan Talaulikar
> *Sent:* Monday, October 23, 2023 1:06 PM
> *To:* DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET
> *Cc:* Matthew Bocci (Nokia) ;
> draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: WG adoption and IPR poll f
adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for your support and comments. Please check inline below for response.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:51 PM
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> wrote:
I support adoption : clarifying spec and improving interop is important.
Hi Ketan
Thanks. That works.
Matthew
From: Ketan Talaulikar
Date: Monday, 23 October 2023 at 12:07
To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Cc: bess@ietf.org , draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
CAUTION: This is an external
Hi Matthew,
We have just posted the WG version of the draft that is identical to the
one that was up for adoption.
We will post another update after incorporating the changes to address
Bruno's comments after we conclude on the text changes.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 4:10 PM
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for your support and comments. Please check inline below for
response.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:51 PM wrote:
> I support adoption : clarifying spec and improving interop is important.
>
>
>
> Thank you for section 4 regarding Backward Compatibility.
>
> May be 1 comment
WG,
There is consensus to adopt this draft as a BESS WG document.
Authors: please respond to the one comment form Bruno and upload a new version
of the draft as draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-00.
Thanks
Matthew
From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Date: Thursday, 28 September 2023 at 15:49
To:
I support the adoption of this document: it provides an important clarification
for interop
Regards,
Luc André
Luc André Burdet | Cisco | laburdet.i...@gmail.com | Tel: +1 613 254 4814
From: BESS on behalf of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:51
To:
I support adoption : clarifying spec and improving interop is important.
Thank you for section 4 regarding Backward Compatibility.
May be 1 comment although I didn't take time to read everything in details and
I'm not familiar with EVPN.
It's not completely clear to me whether backward
Hello,
I reviewed draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02. I consider that this I-D is ready
for endorsement by the BESS WG.
Many Thanks,
-- Brd
From: BESS On Behalf Of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 4:49 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Support the adoption of this draft.
Be well,
G/
From: BESS On Behalf Of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 4:49 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a
I support the adoption.
Thanks to the authors and all the other folks providing inputs to improve the
draft.
Richard
From: BESS on behalf of "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)"
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:49 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org"
Subject:
Hi WG,
I've read the draft and support this adoption.
Best Regards,
Ran
Original
From: MatthewBocci(Nokia)
To: bess@ietf.org ;
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
;
Date: 2023年09月28日 22:51
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
I support the WG adoption of this draft. It's an important update for RFC9252
and benifits the implementation.
Regards,
Yao___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
I reviewed the draft and it’s important updates to RFC 9252 to support SRV6
BGP service overlay to support SRv6 SID ARG field for endpoint behaviors
that require it namely with EVPN RT-1 and RT-3.
I support WG adoption.
Thanks
Gyan
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:50 AM Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <
I support the WG adoption of this draft.
Thanks
Dan
From: BESS on behalf of "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)"
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:49 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org"
Subject: [EXT][bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
I support the WG adoption of this draft.
Thanks.
Diego.
From: BESS on behalf of "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)"
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:51 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
-a...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Support the adoption of this draft.
From: BESS on behalf of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:51 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-trr
I support for adoption.
Thanks
Krishna
From: BESS on behalf of "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)"
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 9:51 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email
Support the adoption of this draft.
From: BESS on behalf of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:51 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
This email begins a
: Re: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
Hi All,
I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document.
As a co-author, I would request the WG to support adoption - this updates the
RFC9252 that was produced by our WG and provides clarifications that were found
Hi All,
I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document.
As a co-author, I would request the WG to support adoption - this updates
the RFC9252 that was produced by our WG and provides clarifications that
were found to be required during the multi-vendor interop.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Thu,
Hi,
As co-author, I support the document for WG adoption. It is important to have
this adopted as soon as possible to make sure all EVPN SRv6 multi-homing
implementations follow the same procedures.
Not aware of any relevant IPR.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Date: Thursday,
24 matches
Mail list logo
