Should this change in release number be of any concern to non-techies
like myself. Should I continue to update nightlies as always? Thank you.
Ikabob's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32088
View thi
Should this change in release number be of any concern to non-techies
like myself.
No. It's really just a different way to distinguish revisions. With svn
every checkin would increase the number by 1. Git doesn't provide revision
numbers, but hashes. Therefore we use the timestamp of the las
Meridion wrote:
> Yes, full rescan works ok. But you loose track of 'new music' (latest
> additions to the library) with the rescan. I really like the list of
> recently added albums.It still keeps 'new music' in order with a full rescan,
> as long as you
don't change the timestamp when amending
But there's no Windows build?
verypsb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17295
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95111
___
But there's no Windows build?
It needs some extra love :-).
--
Michael
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
Mentally transmitting love and karma towards the build server
slate's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30502
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95111
__
No Windows nightlies for 3 days - could someone start the build, please
:-=)
frank1969's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95123
Michael wrote that they are aware of the problem. They are still working
out the kinks from the shift to new version handling
slate's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30502
View this thread: http://f
No Windows nightlies for 3 days - could someone start the build, please
There's been no change anyway. Don't panic :-).
--
Michael
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
mherger wrote:
> There's been no change anyway. Don't panic :-)Michael
lol, thanks - but I'm not sure if I shouldn't panic FOR there are no
changes... ;-)
frank1969's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?user
bonze wrote:
> It still keeps 'new music' in order with a full rescan, as long as you
> don't change the timestamp when amending with Mp3tag
You're right. If I would "touch" the files when adding to the library,
and if I wouldn't touch the filedate when changing tags, they would stay
in chronolo
@mherger:
I've made an amazing test concerning the bug:
I got an old album with 14 tracks in my database.
Now I got a new edition with NEW artwork and 30 tracks on it!
So I DELETED the old folder includinge the old album and added the WHOLE
NEW album...
After an update scan I see:
The FIRST 1
I just noticed this in my ubuntu box's dmesg:
Code:
[ 3783.689658] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=00:21:85:97:b6:c5:00:04:20:06:29:30:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.7 DST=192.168.0.222
LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=8486 PROTO=TCP SPT=7435 DPT=3483
WINDOW=3000 RES=0x00 RST
3483 UDP is the discovery protocol.
3483 TCP is SlimProto, the protocol which has all the low level playback
and synchronization commands.
Without 3483 TCP playback won't work.
bluegaspode's Profile: http://forums.slimde
frank1969 wrote:
> @mherger:
>
> I've made an amazing test concerning the bug:
>
> I got an old album with 14 tracks in my database.
>
> Now I got a new edition with NEW artwork and 30 tracks on it!
>
> So I DELETED the old folder includinge the old album and added the WHOLE
> NEW album...
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
