I would really appreciate if DSTM could make use of Last.fm info with
their API. Of course, it might not be as complete as smartmix, but it
could be a good start to enhance how DSTM populate our playlists.
Try the LastMix plugin.
--
Michael
___
beta
Mnyb wrote:
> So whats your saying is that it works for you on debian with the latest
> 7.9
thats what i'd tried to say - but tbh - its one of many scenarios.
That File wasnt tagged as sampler - may thats another issue???
Mnyb wrote:
> Then its actually better than ever :) is it something
DJanGo wrote:
> i think he uses a special scenario.
>
> i retagged a file from Abba to ABba and did a rescan:
>
> This tells me - rescan is working.
>
> >
Code:
> > select id,name,namesort,namesearch from contributors where name like
'Abba';
> 59|Abba|ABBA|ABBA
Mnyb wrote:
> It seems like add new works just fine , its the changed part that could
> be better ?
>
i think he uses a special scenario.
i retagged a file from Abba to ABba and did a rescan:
This tells me - rescan is working.
Code:
select
DJanGo wrote:
> hmm didnt see that on my setup. but i will check that right now.
ahh ok - just checked that and that afaik pretty new behavior.
copy a song - changed the artist to some rubbish
do a rescan
check for the rubbish artist
removed the fil and did a rescan again
rubbish artist was
One way to put it is if you .
*Scanned all your files at once .
*added one album at time and incrementaly scanned until your finished .
* some mix of the above and then remove stuff tweak it and add again .
If you not into to how computing stuff works ( I do some industrial
controller Stuff ,
frank1969 wrote:
> I don't agree. If I do a complete misspelling (like AA) in my
> library and I correct it, with the next "new and changed"-scan LMS
> removes this "AA" artist from my db. Scanner seems to do some kind
> of cleanup (Maybe Michaee can confess?)
hmm didnt see that on my
