Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-15 Thread Patrick Dixon
Fletch;269483 Wrote: But this is exactly the same error that Patrick reported in that bug. Since 6995 is closed (and a separate Bin-related bug was fixed) it's probably best to open a new bug on the AMD64 issue. It would be very useful to know if the OP is running AMD64. If so,

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-15 Thread Patrick Dixon
The killer file appears to be:- Bin/i386-linux/mDNSResponderPosix -- Patrick Dixon www.at-tunes.co.uk Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-15 Thread Fletch
Patrick Dixon;269623 Wrote: The killer file appears to be:- Bin/i386-linux/mDNSResponderPosix Strange. It does work fine on Xeon running CentOS. This problem didn't occur before because the old Deb just eliminated the whole Bin directory. I suppose we could do that again. Maybe Red Hat

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-15 Thread Patrick Dixon
I haven't actually played any music through it yet, so it's possible that some of the other files may break that. I'll run some tests when I get a chance and report back. -- Patrick Dixon www.at-tunes.co.uk Patrick

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-15 Thread Patrick Dixon
I always get this line in my log:- [08-02-15 11:16:06.3519] Slim::Networking::mDNS::startAdvertising (110) Error: Couldn't find mDNSResponderPosix binary! Aborting! so I guess there is no amd64 mDNSResponderPosix binary, and the i386 one causes a problem. -- Patrick Dixon www.at-tunes.co.uk

[SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-14 Thread greebowarrior
title summarizes it rather well. SC seems totally shagged, the GUI wont load, and when the SB2 does decide to connect to the server, it wont actually display anything i.e. going through the menus gets this Music Library - Artists - Artists - Artists - Artists - Artists... (ad infinitum) this

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-14 Thread Michael Herger
title summarizes it rather well. SC seems totally shagged, the GUI wont load, and when the SB2 does decide to connect to the server, it wont actually display anything From the logs I see that it can't start MySQL. Now it would be pretty helpful, if you could provide us with some information

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-14 Thread greebowarrior
squeezecenter was installed with apt-get install sources.list has the entry deb http://debian.slimdevices.com unstable main (testing main is commented out, and has tried before, again with no luck) I'd just noticed that MySQL was crashing. Had gotten an install working, disabled some plugins,

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-14 Thread Diranged
Diranged;269451 Wrote: Can you post some of the logs from /var/log/squeezecenter? It's hard to say what's going on without those... *edit*: nevermind, i see your log above. let me read it ... [08-02-14 11:26:31.3145] Carp::croak (102) Warning: /usr/sbin/squeezecenter-server: exec

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-14 Thread Patrick Dixon
Diranged;269454 Wrote: [08-02-14 11:26:31.3145] Carp::croak (102) Warning: /usr/sbin/squeezecenter-server: exec failed: No such file or directory at /usr/share/perl5/Slim/Networking/mDNS.pm line 156 That looks pretty strange... what release were you running before, and exactly how did

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-14 Thread Diranged
Patrick Dixon;269456 Wrote: Please see Bug 6995 These are actually separate issues... Bug 6995 is related to some binary in the i386 tree thats being used instead of a local 64bit library, and thats causing problems. This seems to be an install that failed to put all the files in the right

Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] SC 7.0 - Epic Fail

2008-02-14 Thread Fletch
Diranged;269478 Wrote: These are actually separate issues... Bug 6995 is related to some binary in the i386 tree thats being used instead of a local 64bit library, and thats causing problems. But this is exactly the same error that Patrick reported in that bug. Since 6995 is closed (and a