around.
Does that address the issues of rapid feature development, while
satisfying the needs of those who value stability and consistency over
shiny new things?
Doug Ollivier
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http
On 17/04/2011 2:25 a.m., Jim Williams wrote:
it is in line with normal
software. I think if it has to be one or the other then it should be what
the rest of the software world uses.
Which is the challenge, since there are two entirely balanced standards.
Ctrl+Y and Ctrl+Shift+Z are both
Sorry for keeping it off-topic, but the linux icon is not appropriate
for windows. Windows doesn't do gloss like that!
Each platform Should have their own icons. what they shouldn't have
is different logos!
The Windows 7 guidelines are as below for anyone wishing to update the
blender
On 25/11/2010 7:17 a.m., Ton Roosendaal wrote:
Hi Alex,
Based on feedback from key developers, the likelyhood there's a
relicense to LGPL happing is near zero. Let's focus on ways to get end-
user level useful extensions possible.
Is there a way to have closed source extensions work within
public, but to use
it in business, you need to purchase a separate license so that your own
code doesn't become GPL
Very clever business model, but it highlights the issue well!
Doug Ollivier
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http
On 18/11/2010 11:40 a.m., Ivailo Stoimenov wrote:
A have some questions...
Which part of Blender will an extension use?
If it just has access to an API which provides user data (mesh data,
materials and such) and a way to return some processed data to Blender so
this extension is independent
create a bridge
to other software packages, or extend blender features into niche markets
Cheers
Doug Ollivier
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
, Will be able to push the development of Blender from a
pipeline/integration perspective, but are often more accepting of
workarounds. (this is already largely met with the open projects, so I
feel is the least useful from an independent study perspective)
Cheers,
Doug Ollivier
Industrial
people. I would rarely use an animated ENV map.
Doug Ollivier
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
--
Doug Ollivier BDes (Hons)
Industrial Designer
*C:*+64 (0)27 4120807
*P:*+64 (0)3 980 7197
*E:*d...@flipdesign.co.nz
*W:*http
not a coder unfortunately so cannot help there.
Cheers
--
Doug Ollivier
*C:*+64 (0)27 412 0807
*P:*+64 (0)3 980 7197
*E:*d...@doug.org.nz
*W:*http://doug.org.nz
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http
.
Someone let me know if this warrants further development and I will look
at creating a more detailed interface flow scenario.
By trade i'm an Industrial Designer, so can look at usability and
interaction, I'm not a coder unfortunately so cannot help there.
Cheers
--
Doug Ollivier
*C:*+64
12 matches
Mail list logo