[Bf-committers] GPL header...

2019-02-13 Thread Jim Bates
seen a few files w/o header, and some that it's close to 10% of the script. my question is: can this be treated as an external link/ref so not an inline block of comments? This may have been brought up before but I'm just getting back to Blender "add-on" stuff. ___

Re: [Bf-committers] GPL header...

2019-02-17 Thread Brecht Van Lommel
The convention is to always use the full license header when the code is under that license, regardless of the size of the file. There's no alternative shorter header that we use, better to keep the rule about license headers simple & clear. On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:57 AM Jim Bates wrote: > se

Re: [Bf-committers] GPL header...

2019-02-17 Thread Bassam Kurdali
Thanks Brecht, I like this simple rule. That way even if you only have one file (and don't know where it came from) you can still know the license. Bassam On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 20:26 +0100, Brecht Van Lommel wrote: > The convention is to always use the full license header when the code > is > under

Re: [Bf-committers] GPL header...

2019-02-18 Thread Jim Bates
Thank you for confirming standard practice. I was getting a bit giddy about ripping and stripping some code and thought, gee, would be nice to trim that off the top :) wink and a nod. Additionally there are some scripts that have owners copyright only; expect those will be of limited use/distribut