>From the Git statics I created from the jesterking's git mirror, I found
some mistakes,
like mismatching commit number etc.
Jianming
On 26 May 2011 14:13, Lukas Tönne wrote:
> Hello fellow coders,
>
> I have just had the mixed blessing of doing another git-svn branching
> from the 'particles-2
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Jim Williams wrote:
> http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Git_vs_Mercurial
>
> Other than not particularly liking SVN I've no personal preference, but
> it looks like Mercurial would be a better match for Blender -- both in
> terms of a Python orientation and Windows suppo
On 05/27/2011 09:53 AM, GSR wrote:
> Hi,
> g.ula...@gmail.com (2011-05-27 at 0929.04 +0600):
>> I'm not sure switching the whole repo to git is a nice idea. Last time
>> i've checked this it was very painful to work with libs/ repo cloned
>> with git -- simple `git status` used to work ages. Maybe
>From my experience i can clearly see that Blender project should be using
GIT or Mercurial, and that switch is not only about eficiency and less pain,
but also new development possibilities.
Also, those who control the main code repository have the oportunity to
demostrate that blender REALLY bel
Hi,
nat...@letworyinteractive.com (2011-05-27 at 1008.18 +0300):
> > Another thing thats been discussed is having an SVN hook in our
> > existing repo which keeps a GIT repo in sync. Currently the available
> > GIT repos have some lag from trunk, With git matching trunk it would
> > help us evaluat
Hi,
g.ula...@gmail.com (2011-05-27 at 0929.04 +0600):
> I'm not sure switching the whole repo to git is a nice idea. Last time
> i've checked this it was very painful to work with libs/ repo cloned
> with git -- simple `git status` used to work ages. Maybe this is because
> of plenty of binary f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27.5.2011 9:26, Campbell Barton wrote:
> paroneayea and I discussed moving to GIT at length and he brought up
> some issues which we'd need to resolve.
>
> - binaries may need to be masked out of SVN history so the initial
> checkout of lib/ isn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't see the added value in moving svn.blender.org to DVCS per sé,
but since we have had also ideas to use more stringent code review I'd
propose the following:
Developers (especially those we don't have commit right to current SVN)
who wish can st
Hi, Campbell
I've been moving our work SVN repo to GIT at my previous job* and Nathan
should have script which moves SVN repo into GIT repo with handling all
branches and so. So i could make tests too.
But i'd prefer to compare speed GIT vs. Mercurial. I haven't used
mercurial myself, but th
paroneayea and I discussed moving to GIT at length and he brought up
some issues which we'd need to resolve.
- binaries may need to be masked out of SVN history so the initial
checkout of lib/ isn't huge, (paroneayea said its possible with
filter-branch when making the switch but its not trivial).
As long time bf-committers reader who has committed one or two tiny patches in
the past I like to add:
Pros for HG:
More intuitive to use, especially things like revert.
Nicely extensible using Python (e.g. generic keyring integration for repo
passwords).
TortoiseHg > TortoiseGit and cross platf
Hi,
I'm not sure switching the whole repo to git is a nice idea. Last time
i've checked this it was very painful to work with libs/ repo cloned
with git -- simple `git status` used to work ages. Maybe this is because
of plenty of binary files, not sure. And size of that local cloned repo
was
+1 for switching to git or Mercurial. I am also maintaining several git
branches (across a few machines) locally and rebasing from SVN is a pain.
- Original Message -
> http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Git_vs_Mercurial
>
> Other than not particularly liking SVN I've no personal preference,
> b
http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Git_vs_Mercurial
Other than not particularly liking SVN I've no personal preference, but
it looks like Mercurial would be a better match for Blender -- both in
terms of a Python orientation and Windows support.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Tom M wrote:
> It was di
It was discussed a bit yesterday on irc as Jason was updating his
sculpt branch to head that it would haven been much less pain with GIT
potentially.
Brecht and Ideasman and other core maintainers what are your views on
moving to git or mercury?
Ultimately the decision will be up to Ton of course
+100 \o/
I really know what you mean, I have this problem since the age of cvs.. so +1.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Lukas Tönne
wrote:
> Hello fellow coders,
>
> I have just had the mixed blessing of doing another git-svn branching
> from the 'particles-2010' svn branch i'm currently mainta
Hello fellow coders,
I have just had the mixed blessing of doing another git-svn branching
from the 'particles-2010' svn branch i'm currently maintaining. Even
though i already work with git locally to make use of its much nicer
local staging and commit capabilities, the branching resulted in tota
17 matches
Mail list logo
