[Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-15 Thread Thomas Dinges
Hi developers, everyone who has a finished patch/branch and wants it to be included in 2.62 should report back the status here of the project here on the ML. It's important that you search yourself a reviewer, a project without review can't go in. We then can decide in the sunday meeting on the

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-15 Thread Dalai Felinto
Hi, I would like cucumber to finally make its way into trunk. The part that needs review (Brecht's) is the lighting. There is a medium term plan to have it landing in the second stage of the ge_harmony branch. So if Brecht things it shouldn't be in trunk now the light part can be (not so easily b

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-16 Thread Antony Riakiotakis
Count onion uv tools branch too. it's waiting since forever. I still want to tweak a couple of things but I think it's mostly OK. All core developers have occasionally offered to review but other things to do have always crept around. LetterRip who was my mentor for the project has communicated say

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-16 Thread Sergey Sharybin
Hi, Any branches/projects which aren't reviewing or which need to be placed to code review and reviewed? -- With best regards, Sergey Sharybin ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committ

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-16 Thread pete larabell
Hey there, Sorry if this isn't the correct place to state this. Lukas agreed to do review of Double Edge Matte node for compositor. I'm hoping this can get in for 2.62 :) Cheers Peter On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Sergey Sharybin wrote: > Hi, > > Any branches/projects which aren't reviewin

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-16 Thread Antony Riakiotakis
Reminding, uv tools is here http://codereview.appspot.com/5306077/ ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-17 Thread David
On Dec 16, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Thomas Dinges wrote: > Hi developers, > everyone who has a finished patch/branch and wants it to be included in > 2.62 should report back the status here of the project here on the ML. I'd love to see these patches in 2.62: http://projects.blender.org/tracker/index.

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-17 Thread Antony Riakiotakis
+1 to both patches above.. Didn't find time to review but the functionality is much needed especially the LUT conversion. ___ Bf-committers mailing list Bf-committers@blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-17 Thread Dan Eicher
I'd like to get my fcurves easing algorithm patch included in the next release: http://projects.blender.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=22084&group_id=9&atid=127 Have the patch updated for trunk but it still needs ~20 minutes more work to fix a few compiler warnings about unused variables and add th

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-18 Thread Alex Fraser
Hi Thomas, - Original Message - > everyone who has a finished patch/branch and wants it to be included > in 2.62 should report back the status here of the project here on the > ML. I'd like to get vertex colour baking included: http://projects.blender.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&ai

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-21 Thread Antony Riakiotakis
Come to think of it I would also like to add the occlusion query based selection. It's not working with depth but it can solve selection issues for some users, even in its current state. Is it OK to add this in for this release? ___ Bf-committers mailing

Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62

2011-12-27 Thread Vilem Novak
just fine in such scenes. > Původní zpráva > Od: Antony Riakiotakis > Předmět: Re: [Bf-committers] Release targets for 2.62 > Datum: 21.12.2011 17:10:40 > > Come to think of it I would also like to add the occ