Re: [Bibdesk-users] Best practices for URL fields?

On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > So in templates you should most often use something like > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] > instead of $urls.Local-Url.path, samilar for the URL. Also > $fields.URL, and $URL, was probably never a good choice, as it may > contain late

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Question for Autofile in BibDesk 1.3.14

On 1/28/08, Christiaan Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 29 Jan 2008, at 12:52 AM, P Kishor wrote: > > > On 1/28/08, Christiaan Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We don't do that because Apple still does not provide a - > >> readUsersMind method (not even in Leopard). > > > > well, we d

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Question for Autofile in BibDesk 1.3.14

On 29 Jan 2008, at 12:52 AM, P Kishor wrote: > On 1/28/08, Christiaan Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> We don't do that because Apple still does not provide a - >> readUsersMind method (not even in Leopard). > > well, we don't need readUsersMind. Perhaps we need a > createUniqueStringAndAttac

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Question for Autofile in BibDesk 1.3.14

On 1/28/08, Christiaan Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We don't do that because Apple still does not provide a - > readUsersMind method (not even in Leopard). well, we don't need readUsersMind. Perhaps we need a createUniqueStringAndAttachItToTheEndOfTheUsersSpecifiedString Since this unique

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Question for Autofile in BibDesk 1.3.14

We don't do that because Apple still does not provide a - readUsersMind method (not even in Leopard). Christiaan On 29 Jan 2008, at 12:21 AM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote: > Maybe the dialog box should by default automatically add a unique > specifier for the user? Just trying to think about h

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Question for Autofile in BibDesk 1.3.14

Maybe the dialog box should by default automatically add a unique specifier for the user? Just trying to think about how to make this question come up a little less... -A On 2008-01-28, at 12:43 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > I wish people would actually read the alerts they get. It clearly

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Best practices for URL fields?

Generally, the Url and Local-Url fields are deprecated. So don't assume it's there if it's not a standard (required or optional) field. We encourage everyone to remove old style URL fields and switch to the new file layout. The URL field is only to be used for inclusion in the bibliography,

[Bibdesk-users] Best practices for URL fields?

I know URL fields have been discussed a good bit, but I'd just like to make sure I'm using them as intended in the templates that are supplied with CiteInPages--and that I express accurately to other users any issues in the way I'm using them that they should understand. For several types of

Re: [Bibdesk-users] template files preferences

On 28 Jan 2008, at 10:41 PM, Daniele Pontillo wrote: > > Il giorno 28/gen/08, alle ore 22:37, Christiaan Hofman ha scritto: > >> I'm sure you're using Leopard? And you didn't get used to the new >> editing behavior of tables yet (like changing Finder names)? > > I beg your pardon. Could you pleas

Re: [Bibdesk-users] template files preferences

Il giorno 28/gen/08, alle ore 22:37, Christiaan Hofman ha scritto: > I'm sure you're using Leopard? And you didn't get used to the new > editing behavior of tables yet (like changing Finder names)? I beg your pardon. Could you please help me change the name? > > > Christiaan > > On 28 Jan 2008,

Re: [Bibdesk-users] template files preferences

I'm sure you're using Leopard? And you didn't get used to the new editing behavior of tables yet (like changing Finder names)? Christiaan On 28 Jan 2008, at 10:29 PM, Daniele Pontillo wrote: > Hello! > I was installing citeinpages, and couldn't get to change the name of a > new template with a

Re: [Bibdesk-users] template files preferences

On Jan 28, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Daniele Pontillo wrote: > I was installing citeinpages, and couldn't get to change the name of a > new template with a double click on the row. > This makes useless having templates with citeinpages Do you mean when installing template files as templates in BibDesk's

[Bibdesk-users] template files preferences

Hello! I was installing citeinpages, and couldn't get to change the name of a new template with a double click on the row. This makes useless having templates with citeinpages Thanks Daniele Pontillo Chief, Echo Lab, Cardiology, Belcolle Hospital Strada Sanmartinese, Viterbo, Italy 01100 Work: +

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Problem with "open by" and using TimeMachine on Leopard 5.1

Hi, will try tomorrow (European Time) thanks, Rolf Am 28.01.2008 um 21:37 schrieb Christiaan Hofman: > Please try the next nightly build to se of this problem is solved. We > will now remove duplicate apps with the same version number. So old > versions in time machine may still show up. > > Ch

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Question for Autofile in BibDesk 1.3.14

Hi Am 28.01.2008 um 20:51 schrieb Yunchang Shin: > Hi > I have been using local-Url format as "%a1(%Y)-%t0%e" so far without > any problem until 1.3.12. > > Recently, after I updated with 1.3.14, I can no longer use this > combination for my auto filing. > it keep saying it is invalid. let me gu

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Question for Autofile in BibDesk 1.3.14

I wish people would actually read the alerts they get. It clearly says that you need to include a unique specifier, which is one of %u, %U or %n. So the answer is: no, you cannot. I don't know what you did after getting the initial alert, but I strongly advice you to go to the Preferences a

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Problem with "open by" and using TimeMachine on Leopard 5.1

Please try the next nightly build to se of this problem is solved. We will now remove duplicate apps with the same version number. So old versions in time machine may still show up. Christiaan On 27 Jan 2008, at 10:33 PM, Rolf Schmolling wrote: > Hello! > > I noticed sth. peculiar: I wanted

[Bibdesk-users] Question for Autofile in BibDesk 1.3.14

Hi I have been using local-Url format as "%a1(%Y)-%t0%e" so far without any problem until 1.3.12. Recently, after I updated with 1.3.14, I can no longer use this combination for my auto filing. it keep saying it is invalid. Does anyone know if I can keep this combination or not? If not, how ca

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Preview template clarification

On 28 Jan 2008, at 7:15 PM, James Harrison wrote: A few days back someone suggested that it might be convenient to be able to switch the preview pane quickly between multiple template files. That would be useful for me to allow switching between displays that included the abst

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Preview template clarification

>>> A few days back someone suggested that it might be convenient to >>> be able to switch the preview pane quickly between multiple >>> template files. That would be useful for me to allow switching >>> between displays that included the abstract, annotations and Skim >>> notes depending o

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Preview template

Perhaps you can also link these on the Wiki? Christiaan On 28 Jan 2008, at 7:14 AM, James Harrison wrote: > In case it would be useful to anyone, I've put up an RTF template > based on the CiteInPages AMAstyle template file that I use for > BibDesk's preview pane. Aside from being a compact disp

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Preview template clarification

And did you use the latest nightlies? Christiaan On 28 Jan 2008, at 7:20 AM, James Harrison wrote: > Of course I meant the *preview* pane in the third paragraph below, not > preferences pane. And the point was to be able to optionally display > the abstract, annotation and Skim notes on demand i

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Local File column and formats

On 28 Jan 2008, at 1:36 AM, Adam M. Goldstein wrote: > On Jan 27, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Cloy Tobola wrote: > >> >> 1. I understand the change to the Local File column. When that column >> is set to be very narrow, would it be better to have the number of >> linked files appear [rather than just a pap

Re: [Bibdesk-users] The BibDesk input manager – a question and a plea

>> > > I'm sick today so decided to try hacking this into TeXShop myself. > Please download > . I've basically integrated the guts of the input manager into > TeXShop, using our newer Distributed Objects API. Barely tested, no > warranty,