Re: [Bibdesk-users] Way to make Skim default only in Bibdesk?

2009-01-22 Thread Adam R. Maxwell
On Jan 22, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Robert Sloan wrote: Is there a way to tell Bibdesk that I want it to open linked PDF's with Skim by default whereas I want Preview to be the overall OS X default PDF viewer? http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/manual/BibDesk%20Help_70.html#SEC131 You can also ontrol-c

[Bibdesk-users] Testing new feature: PubMed lookup for dropped PDFs

2009-01-22 Thread Gregory Jefferis
Dear BibDesk+PubMed users, As mentioned in the thread on a new release there is a new feature which allows PDFs dropped onto the table view in BibDesk to be recognised and the full bibliographic information retrieved from PubMed to generate a new publication record. This should be very handy for

[Bibdesk-users] Way to make Skim default only in Bibdesk?

2009-01-22 Thread Robert Sloan
Is there a way to tell Bibdesk that I want it to open linked PDF's with Skim by default whereas I want Preview to be the overall OS X default PDF viewer? If not, could a preference be added? (Rationale: I find Skim best for research papers I'm either reading or writing, but Preview preferab

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Ready for a new release?

2009-01-22 Thread Alex Hamann
On 22.01.2009, at 23:46, Maxwell, Adam R wrote: > On 01/22/09 15:40, "Adam M. Goldstein" wrote: > >> Also---I wonder, is it time to up the version number by more than . >> 01, >> to, say, BD 1.4.0? > > I think we were only changing the major version number when support > for an > OS version i

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Ready for a new release?

2009-01-22 Thread Christiaan Hofman
On 23 Jan 2009, at 12:40 AM, Adam M. Goldstein wrote: > Hello all, > > I am hoping that those of you who like to live on the edge will start > testing nightlies so we can see if there are any more kinks that need > to be worked out in the latest BD code before we make another release. > Christiaa

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Ready for a new release?

2009-01-22 Thread Adam M. Goldstein
On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:46 PM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote: > On 01/22/09 15:40, "Adam M. Goldstein" wrote: > >> Also---I wonder, is it time to up the version number by more than . >> 01, >> to, say, BD 1.4.0? > > I think we were only changing the major version number when support > for an > OS versio

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Ready for a new release?

2009-01-22 Thread Maxwell, Adam R
On 01/22/09 15:40, "Adam M. Goldstein" wrote: > Also---I wonder, is it time to up the version number by more than .01, > to, say, BD 1.4.0? I think we were only changing the major version number when support for an OS version is dropped, so 1.4.0 should be accompanied by dropping support for Tig

[Bibdesk-users] Ready for a new release?

2009-01-22 Thread Adam M. Goldstein
Hello all, I am hoping that those of you who like to live on the edge will start testing nightlies so we can see if there are any more kinks that need to be worked out in the latest BD code before we make another release. Christiaan and other coders, speak up if there's something you'd like