On 27.05.2011, at 00:05, David Goldenberg wrote:
> Thanks very much to Simon and Christian for their helpful responses.
> (I just saw them in the digest today.) I've not paid much attention
> to BibLaTeX. Is it catching on widely (or as widely as things can in
> the LaTeX world)?
Well,
07:46:58 +0200
> From: Simon Spiegel
> Subject: Re: [Bibdesk-users] DOI and URL handling
> To: For general discussion about using BibDesk
>
> Message-ID: <3d24b270-946b-419e-b28b-0973160d4...@simifilm.ch>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
>
>
On May 20, 2011, at 22:31, David Goldenberg wrote:
> Hi,
>Is there available somewhere a concise (or even not so concise)
> description of how best to handle URLs and DOIs with BibDesk and
> BibTeX? There seem to be multiple fields that can be used for this
> information, and it is a b
On 20.05.2011, at 22:31, David Goldenberg wrote:
> Hi,
>Is there available somewhere a concise (or even not so concise)
> description of how best to handle URLs and DOIs with BibDesk and
> BibTeX? There seem to be multiple fields that can be used for this
> information, and it is a bit
Hi,
Is there available somewhere a concise (or even not so concise)
description of how best to handle URLs and DOIs with BibDesk and
BibTeX? There seem to be multiple fields that can be used for this
information, and it is a bit confusing to me which are preferable and
how information
