Le 25 janv. 09 à 11:50, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On 25 Jan 2009, at 11:14 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Thanks, Christian.
It now works as I wanted (that is: cite-key is added and pdf auto-
filed) provided I set up the properties:
generateCiteKey yes
autoFileLinkedFile no
If I
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:07 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 25 janv. 09 à 11:50, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On 25 Jan 2009, at 11:14 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Thanks, Christian.
It now works as I wanted (that is: cite-key is added and pdf auto-
filed) provided I set up the
Le 25 janv. 09 à 12:17, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:07 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 25 janv. 09 à 11:50, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On 25 Jan 2009, at 11:14 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Thanks, Christian.
It now works as I wanted (that is: cite-key
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:53 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 25 janv. 09 à 12:17, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:07 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 25 janv. 09 à 11:50, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On 25 Jan 2009, at 11:14 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 25 janv. 09 à 13:29, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:53 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 25 janv. 09 à 12:17, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:07 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 25 janv. 09 à 11:50, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
On 25
On 24 Jan 2009, at 12:35 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 24 janv. 09 à 12:12, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
This is not really true, it's just been disabled by default. See the
Wiki how to re-enable this feature using a hidden preference. The
reason is that the check is far too generic.
Le 24 janv. 09 à 14:17, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
Hi Christiaan,
I'm convinced, thanks. Indeed I had some files converted to the wrong
entries because their names were actually a page number and BibDesk
found in PubMed a PMID with the same value :-) There were not too
many, though, and
I must say that this hidden feature was very useful to me. It helped
me a lot, and still does so, when importing the tones of pdf files I
had in my drive from my pre-BibDesk times. I will miss it if totally
removed...
Miguel
Le 24 janv. 09 à 18:19, Adam R. Maxwell a écrit :
On Jan 24,
On 24 Jan 2009, at 6:19 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
On Jan 24, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 24 Jan 2009, at 12:35 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Le 24 janv. 09 à 12:12, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
This is not really true, it's just been disabled by default. See
Sorry, still doesn't work... Should I do anything else after replacing
the sdef file? I checked the preferences and the script hook is still
attached to Import Publications.
Thank you!
Miguel
Le 24 janv. 09 à 20:45, Christiaan Hofman a écrit :
Sorry, not your fault, it's a problem with
Please download a fixed version of the script hook from the Wiki.
Christiaan
On 24 Jan 2009, at 9:20 PM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Sorry, still doesn't work... Should I do anything else after replacing
the sdef file? I checked the preferences and the script hook is still
attached to
Scripts never trigger auto-filing or autogeneration of the cite key,
only direct user interactions do. They can do the auto-filing and auto-
generation themselves using the various script commands though.
Christiaan
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:25 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Thanks!
Now it
I've modified the script hook on the wiki adding some options to allow
generating the key and/or auto-filing. Open it in Script Editor and
change the four options to your liking.
Christiaan
On 25 Jan 2009, at 12:25 AM, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:
Thanks!
Now it finds the info and
On 01/22/09 15:57, Christiaan Hofman cmhof...@gmail.com wrote:
I just updated the release notes, so please look at those to see
what's changed.
Xcode crashed during last night's scheduled build, so I reran it this
morning. The build with updated release notes is dated 23 Jan, and was
posted
Hello all,
I am hoping that those of you who like to live on the edge will start
testing nightlies so we can see if there are any more kinks that need
to be worked out in the latest BD code before we make another release.
Christiaan and other coders, speak up if there's something you'd like
On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:46 PM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote:
On 01/22/09 15:40, Adam M. Goldstein a.m.goldst...@mac.com wrote:
Also---I wonder, is it time to up the version number by more than .
01,
to, say, BD 1.4.0?
I think we were only changing the major version number when support
for an
On 22.01.2009, at 23:46, Maxwell, Adam R wrote:
On 01/22/09 15:40, Adam M. Goldstein a.m.goldst...@mac.com wrote:
Also---I wonder, is it time to up the version number by more than .
01,
to, say, BD 1.4.0?
I think we were only changing the major version number when support
for an
OS
17 matches
Mail list logo
