On 9 May 2008, at 10:17 AM, James Owen wrote:
However, for some reason, BibDesk is no longer putting the contents
of the doi: field into the Doi: field in my bibtex archive. It
used to, before 1.3.15. is there some problem with case
sensitivity? If I added a doi field as well as a Doi
On 6 May 2008, at 20:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using
Bibdesk. I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX
for quite some time, but I am fairly new to mac and to Bibdesk. I
would like to ask, if you
On 8 May 2008, at 4:44 PM, James Owen wrote:
On 6 May 2008, at 20:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using
Bibdesk. I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX
for quite some time, but I am fairly new to mac
On 9 May 2008, at 12:14 AM, Robin wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using
Bibdesk.
I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX for quite
some
time, but I am fairly new
nbsp;Hi There,
I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using Bibdesk. I
truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX for quite some time, but
I am fairly new to mac and to Bibdesk. I would like to ask, if you can somehow
search Web of science. Or, if you can't,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
nbsp;Hi There,
I am sorry to bother you, but I found myself rather lost when using Bibdesk.
I truly love it, and I am physicist/chemist using BibTeX for quite some time,
but I am fairly new to mac and to Bibdesk. I would like to ask,
