On 2007-October-09 , at 19:39 , Ingrid Giffin wrote:
> On 10/9/07 7:20 AM, "Bruce Pourciau"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Oct 7, 2007, at 9:47 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
>>> I tried looking at MacTex (I think it was), but I really don’t
>>> need the
>>> heavy typesetting capabilities. I ra
>Doesn't a custom Local File field work, when you have set iTunes as the
>system default for opening podcasts?
I was thinking more about referencing for publication and dissemination...
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: S
Doesn't a custom Local File field work, when you have set iTunes as
the system default for opening podcasts?
Christiaan
On 9 Oct 2007, at 5:47 PM, Jason Davies wrote:
> incidentally, is there an 'accepted' way to link to things like
> podcasts (yet)? As more and more become legitimate sources
On 10/9/07 7:20 AM, "Bruce Pourciau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2007, at 9:47 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
>
>>
>> I tried looking at MacTex (I think it was), but I really don¹t need the
>> heavy typesetting capabilities. I ran screaming to Mellel. I use BibDesk for
>> my master pu
We might take a look at http://thedata.org/citation and http://
gking.harvard.edu/files/cite.pdf
These try to take a look at linking to the thing itself rather than
a location for the thing.
-N
On 9 Oct 2007, at 11:47 AM, Jason Davies wrote:
incidentally, is there an 'accepted' way to li
incidentally, is there an 'accepted' way to link to things like
podcasts (yet)? As more and more become legitimate sources
(prestigious speakers and stable access), is anyone thinking
about how to cite them? In the meantime, does anyone have any
sugestions (eg can we get a unique link to use in
On Oct 9, 2007, at 04:07, jiho wrote:
> On 2007-October-08 , at 18:37 , Maxwell, Adam R wrote:
>> On 10/08/07 09:21, "jiho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
> latex2rtf used to always output (SomeName,
> 2000; SomeOtherName, 2004) instead of what was specified in bibpunct.
> Anyway, that seems fix
On Oct 7, 2007, at 9:47 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote:
I tried looking at MacTex (I think it was), but I really don’t need
the
heavy typesetting capabilities. I ran screaming to Mellel. I use
BibDesk for
my master publications database because the interface is so nice,
although,
as I said in ano
On 2007-October-08 , at 18:37 , Maxwell, Adam R wrote:
> On 10/08/07 09:21, "jiho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2007-October-08 , at 18:03 , Simon Spiegel wrote:
> [...]
>
>> I also use latex2rtf but simply because there is no real alternative.
>> I also found it has many limitations:
>> - I
On 08.10.2007, at 19:14, Jason Davies wrote:
>>> I will put in another vote for this strategy, which I use
>>> frequently.
>>> I haven't had any problems with using bib styles of my own creation,
>>> either.
>>
>> IME latex2rtf is way too limited. It doesn't produce anything useful
>> with eith
>>I will put in another vote for this strategy, which I use frequently.
>>I haven't had any problems with using bib styles of my own creation,
>>either.
>
>IME latex2rtf is way too limited. It doesn't produce anything useful
>with either jurabib nor biblatex which is a big problem for people in
>hu
On 10/08/07 09:21, "jiho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-October-08 , at 18:03 , Simon Spiegel wrote:
>> IME latex2rtf is way too limited. It doesn't produce anything useful
>> with either jurabib nor biblatex which is a big problem for people in
>> humanities.
There's no point in supp
On 2007-October-08 , at 18:03 , Simon Spiegel wrote:
> On 08.10.2007, at 17:30, Adam M. Goldstein wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>>> On Oct 8, 2007, at 04:10, Jason Davies wrote:
> As an alternative for collaborative work that has to use some
> kind of
>
On 08.10.2007, at 17:30, Adam M. Goldstein wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2007, at 04:10, Jason Davies wrote:
>>
As an alternative for collaborative work that has to use some
kind of
"widely accepted commercial software", I use LaTeX
On Oct 8, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 04:10, Jason Davies wrote:
>
>>> As an alternative for collaborative work that has to use some
>>> kind of
>>> "widely accepted commercial software", I use LaTeX / BibTeX >
>>> latex2rtf. So I can at least write my initia
On Oct 8, 2007, at 04:10, Jason Davies wrote:
>> As an alternative for collaborative work that has to use some kind of
>> "widely accepted commercial software", I use LaTeX / BibTeX >
>> latex2rtf. So I can at least write my initial text and citations in a
>> manner that does not completely drive
>As an alternative for collaborative work that has to use some kind of
>"widely accepted commercial software", I use LaTeX / BibTeX >
>latex2rtf. So I can at least write my initial text and citations in a
>manner that does not completely drive me crazy…
yes, I've been doing this increasingly too.
On Mo, 8.10.2007, 10:28, Andreas Reinecke wrote:
>
> Am 08.10.2007 um 06:33 schrieb Adam R. Maxwell:
>
>> I've always had the same impression: most of us use LaTeX, although I
>> now know of at least four on this list who don't.
>>
> Well, then I will be #5 on your list. To me, BD is a great
> appl
Am 08.10.2007 um 06:33 schrieb Adam R. Maxwell:
...
I've always had the same impression: most of us use LaTeX, although I
now know of at least four on this list who don't.
Well, then I will be #5 on your list. To me, BD is a great
application to administrate and browse my references. But w
Same here, a XeLaTeX user. I'm actually pretty clueless how to do stuff
other than BibTeX with BD. For me BD is the interface between source and
XeLaTeX which also gives me the chance to collect and review my bibs. Once
everything is complete I only access my data via BibTeX.
--
>
>> I can imagine that Tex held some appeal to some people at some point
>> in time, but there is little use I see in it for myself. For me,
>> TextEdit is more easy and flexible.
>
> Depends. On the negative side, I find LaTeX code annoying to read and
> write, and things like encodings and fo
On Oct 7, 2007, at 19:36, P Kishor wrote:
> On 10/7/07, Derick Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm not one of the developers but you both know that Bibdesk is a
>> software for generating Bibtex-files which are used in LaTeX-
>> documents.
>> I wonder how many users would agree with this
On Oct 7, 2007, at 20:58, Michael McCracken wrote:
> On 10/7/07, Derick Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not one of the developers but you both know that Bibdesk is a
>> software for generating Bibtex-files which are used in LaTeX-
>> documents.
>> I wonder how many users would agree with
On 10/7/07, Derick Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm not one of the developers but you both know that Bibdesk is a
> software for generating Bibtex-files which are used in LaTeX-
> documents.
> I wonder how many users would agree with this characterization -- I don't
> use BibTex at all - do
On 10/7/07 8:36 PM, "P Kishor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mellel + Bookends seems to do exactly what I dream of, but I don't want to use
> Mellel because it can't handle South Asian scripts.
Possibly veering off topic here, but FYI, there is a thread on this at
http://forum.redlers.com/viewto
On 10/7/07 6:52 PM, "Derick Fay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not one of the developers but you both know that Bibdesk is a
>> software for generating Bibtex-files which are used in LaTeX-
>> documents.
>
> I wonder how many users would agree with this characterization -- I don't use
>
On 10/7/07, Derick Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm not one of the developers but you both know that Bibdesk is a
> software for generating Bibtex-files which are used in LaTeX-
> documents.
> I wonder how many users would agree with this characterization -- I don't
> use BibTex at all - do
I'm not one of the developers but you both know that Bibdesk is a
software for generating Bibtex-files which are used in LaTeX-
documents.
I wonder how many users would agree with this characterization -- I
don't use BibTex at all - do most other BibDesk users?
I see BibDesk as a reference m
28 matches
Mail list logo
