Re: [openSuSE 11.1] the working directory is not writable

2009-01-12 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Lothar Behrens wrote: Jan 9 11:55:53 vmhost named[11970]: starting BIND 9.5.0-P2 -t /var/ lib/named -u named Chrooting to /var/lib/named Jan 9 11:55:53 vmhost named[11970]: the working directory is not writable My working directory is /var/lib/named and the

Re: [openSuSE 11.1] the working directory is not writable

2009-01-12 Thread Chris Buxton
On Jan 12, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Lothar Behrens wrote: Jan 9 11:55:53 vmhost named[11970]: starting BIND 9.5.0-P2 -t /var/ lib/named -u named Chrooting to /var/lib/named Jan 9 11:55:53 vmhost named[11970]: the working directory is not writable My

Any options in named.conf to force recursion?

2009-01-12 Thread anand . bapat
Is there a option for use in named.conf to force recursion ? ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: Any options in named.conf to force recursion?

2009-01-12 Thread Todd Snyder
If you don't host any zones on the server, then it would always recurse, no? The server will always answer for zones it's authoritative for, as far as my understanding. You might need to explain more about your confguration/desired outcome than you currently have. Todd. -Original

Re: Unable to get authenticated negative responses from BIND 9.6.0 w/ NSEC3?

2009-01-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message a0e00a9b-89cc-4b94-a3a5-49fd22fe3...@johani.org, Johan Ihren writes: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I realise this just has to be a user error, but sofar I've been completely unsuccessful in getting an authenticated response from a 9.6.0 recursive server with

Re: Unable to get authenticated negative responses from BIND 9.6.0 w/ NSEC3?

2009-01-12 Thread Johan Ihren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, On 12 Jan 2009, at 23:49, Mark Andrews wrote: I realise this just has to be a user error, but sofar I've been completely unsuccessful in getting an authenticated response from a 9.6.0 recursive server with trusted keys correctly

Re: Bind 9.6.0p1- Windows - The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion.

2009-01-12 Thread Danny Mayer
Chiesa Stefano wrote: Hi all. Maybe it's not a new issue, but... I have a Windows 2003 SP2 with a 9.4.2 release that worked fine for years. Today I wanted to upgrade my release to 9.6. I installed it but when I try to start the service the system says: Event Type: Error Event Source:

Re: Any options in named.conf to force recursion?

2009-01-12 Thread Barry Margolin
In article gkgeld$1ur...@sf1.isc.org, anand.ba...@gmail.com wrote: I know that by default recursion is yes (recursion yes; ). I would like to know if it is possible to enforce recursion for all the DNS queries going out of the host on which the named is configured. Do you mean that when it

Re: Unable to get authenticated negative responses from BIND 9.6.0 w/ NSEC3?

2009-01-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 088512ac-625e-4a72-aa90-65c73fb8b...@johani.org, Johan Ihren writes: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, On 12 Jan 2009, at 23:49, Mark Andrews wrote: I realise this just has to be a user error, but sofar I've been completely unsuccessful in getting an