In message <20090114021016.ga24...@esri.com>, Ray Van Dolson writes:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:00:38PM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:35:46PM -0800, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > The number of nameservers that fail to respond to EDNS
> > > queries is miniscule. The
In message , Rich Goodson
writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some caching resolvers that are running BIND 9.4.3. They
> answer about 30k-ish recursive queries per second at peak hours.
>
> Every couple of weeks or so, we get calls to customer support with
> complaints that the www.capitalone.com
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:00:38PM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:35:46PM -0800, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > The number of nameservers that fail to respond to EDNS
> > queries is miniscule. The majority of nameservers on the
> > net actually talk EDNS.
> >
> >
See http://ftp.isc.org/www/bind/arm95/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#id2593348
(Sorry that is for a different version of BIND, but it does cover more
statistics info.)
If you need any specific clarifications, please let us know.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-user
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:40, Baird, Josh wrote:
> I am in the process of developing a DR (disaster recovery) plan for my
> primary masters. Could someone please confirm (or correct me) that a
> second server in the "masters {}" statement of a slave zone will only be
> used in the event that
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:35:46PM -0800, Mark Andrews wrote:
> The number of nameservers that fail to respond to EDNS
> queries is miniscule. The majority of nameservers on the
> net actually talk EDNS.
>
> I suggest that you re-analyse the failures to determine
> t
I am in the process of developing a DR (disaster recovery) plan for my primary
masters. Could someone please confirm (or correct me) that a second server in
the "masters {}" statement of a slave zone will only be used in the event that
the first master cannot be reached? Example:
zone "examp
In message <20090114000726.ga23...@esri.com>, Ray Van Dolson writes:
> I know what ISC will say on this -- that we should be tracking down
> people whose DNS servers or network infrastructure blocks or impedes
> EDNS... this is fine and well, and we do make such efforts, but often
> times networ o
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of ip admin
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:23 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Current named statistics format documentation
Hi,
any idea where the statistic number currently reported to the
Hi,
any idea where the statistic number currently reported to the named.stats
file are documented. The ARM only describes some. For BIND 9.4.1 I get the
following counters
++ Name Server Statistics ++
(Legend)
success referral nxrrset nxdomain recursion
failure dupquerydr
I know what ISC will say on this -- that we should be tracking down
people whose DNS servers or network infrastructure blocks or impedes
EDNS... this is fine and well, and we do make such efforts, but often
times networ owners are unresponsive and our own customer demands
compel us to disable EDNS
Hi all,
I have some caching resolvers that are running BIND 9.4.3. They
answer about 30k-ish recursive queries per second at peak hours.
Every couple of weeks or so, we get calls to customer support with
complaints that the www.capitalone.com web site is unavailable.
The CNAME for www.capi
When I do a nslookup or dig I only see the first two servers and not sec2:
--
ns-1: nslookup
set type=ns
_tcp.utmck.edu
Non-authoritative answer:
_tcp.utmck.edu nameserver = pri1.utmck.edu
_tcp.utmck.edu nameserver = sec1.utmck.edu
Authoritative answers can be found
Hello,
We have nameservers supporting utmck.edu and delegate the zones used by
Windows to Windows nameservers as follows:
$ORIGIN utmck.edu.
_tcp IN NS pri1.utmck.edu.
IN NS sec1.utmck.edu.
_udp IN NS pri1.utmck.edu.
IN NS
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
> Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
>>> Chiesa Stefano wrote:
Hi all.
Maybe it's not a new issue, but...
I have a Windows 2003 SP2 with a 9.4.2 release that worked fine for
years.
Today I wanted to upgrade my release to 9.6.
I installed it but when I try
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
>> Chiesa Stefano wrote:
>>> Hi all.
>>> Maybe it's not a new issue, but...
>>>
>>> I have a Windows 2003 SP2 with a 9.4.2 release that worked fine for
>>> years.
>>> Today I wanted to upgrade my release to 9.6.
>>> I installed it but when I try to start the service the system
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
>> Chiesa Stefano wrote:
>>> Hi all.
>>> Maybe it's not a new issue, but...
>>>
>>> I have a Windows 2003 SP2 with a 9.4.2 release that worked fine for
>>> years.
>>> Today I wanted to upgrade my release to 9.6.
>>> I installed it but when I try to start the service the system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
Anyone done this recently who can give me a suggestion to where I
may
go wrong?
NXDOMAIN + OPTOUT -> AD=0
Doh! I reversed the logic for OPTOUT in my apparently confused head.
Many thanks for the quick correction. Everything
Chiesa Stefano wrote:
Hi all.
Maybe it's not a new issue, but...
I have a Windows 2003 SP2 with a 9.4.2 release that worked fine for
years.
Today I wanted to upgrade my release to 9.6.
I installed it but when I try to start the service the system says:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Service Co
19 matches
Mail list logo
