Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT "Illegal"

2009-01-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 29.01.09 22:33, Al Stu wrote: > Analyze this. Why? > Query MX dns.com > > Response MX nullmx.domainmanager.com > > > > Query A nullmx.domainmanager.com > > Response CNAME mta.dewile.net, A 64.40.103.249 -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wi

Re: Disable cache in bind 9.6

2009-01-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> В Пнд, 26/01/2009 в 16:16 -0800, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 пишет: > > http://www.jinmei.org/patch/bind9-lrucache.diff > > (should be cleanly applicable to 9.6). > > and let me know if it mitigates the problem? On 29.01.09 22:50, Dmitry Rybin wrote: > Oh, great work. I'll try tomorrow. > > Other reco

Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT "Illegal"

2009-01-29 Thread Al Stu
Analyze this. Query MX dns.com Response MX nullmx.domainmanager.com Query A nullmx.domainmanager.com Response CNAME mta.dewile.net, A 64.40.103.249 See attached network trace. No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Info 1 0.00192.168.1

Re: where is libbind???

2009-01-29 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <795605.17453...@web55604.mail.re4.yahoo.com>, Leonard Mills writes: > One spot is http://ftp.isc.org/isc/libbind/6.0b1/libbind-6.0b1.tar.gz The release announcement for libbind-6.0b1 should be out shortly. The whole process took a bit longer than we were

Re: where is libbind???

2009-01-29 Thread Leonard Mills
One spot is http://ftp.isc.org/isc/libbind/6.0b1/libbind-6.0b1.tar.gz - Original Message From: David Sparks To: "bind-us...@isc.org" Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:22:47 PM Subject: where is libbind??? configure: error: 'libbind' is no longer part of the BIND 9 distribution.

where is libbind???

2009-01-29 Thread David Sparks
configure: error: 'libbind' is no longer part of the BIND 9 distribution. It is available from http://www.isc.org as a separate download. %< I'm unable to locate libbind on www.isc.org. Can someone point at the tarball? Thanks! ___ bind-users m

Re: wildcarding everything

2009-01-29 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <56561f93336c3146836fdde78316154653c...@springnet-ex.springnet.local >, "Ben Bridges" writes: > I found the parking name servers for three domain parking companies, and > every one of them returned a bogus address for my company's website (as > well as every "major" website that I tried

Re: BIND 9.4.x vs 9.6.x - pid-file check and creation

2009-01-29 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4981c105.8080...@sun.com>, Stacey Jonathan Marshall writes: > Mark Andrews wrote: > > Looking at the publically available parts of SunSolve there are at least > > bug reports about it. > > > > Requires Support Contract tmp_mkdir()/xmemfs_mkdir() inconsistent with othe > r xxxfs_mkdir()

Re: Bind 9 query logging

2009-01-29 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:33:31 -0500, cod3fr3ak wrote: > channel query_log > { > file "/var/adm/dns-logs/dns_query.log" versions 7 size 2G; > severity debug 3; > print-category yes; > print-severity yes; >

Re: my DNS not resolving

2009-01-29 Thread Rich Goodson
$ whois jatec.us --snip-- Domain Status: inactive Name Server: ICEMAN.JATEC.US --snip-- Domain Registration Date:Fri Oct 03 21:05:39 GMT 2008 Domain Expiration Date: Fri Oct 02 23:59:59 GMT 2

RE: my DNS not resolving

2009-01-29 Thread Ben Bridges
Did you give your registrar the IP address of your name server? They'll need to have that for the glue records since the name of your name server (iceman.jatec.us) is in your domain. When you issued the dig command on iceman, it queried 205.171.3.65. Is that iceman's address? If so, then iceman

Re: referral doubt

2009-01-29 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:39:01 +, Luis Silva wrote: > I have a question related with the contacting external servers. > If my server receives an referral answer from an external server with 3 NS > records but just 1 A additional record, what is the normal behaviour? is the > server supposed to

Re: Disable cache in bind 9.6

2009-01-29 Thread Dmitry Rybin
В Пнд, 26/01/2009 в 16:16 -0800, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 пишет: > http://www.jinmei.org/patch/bind9-lrucache.diff > (should be cleanly applicable to 9.6). > and let me know if it mitigates the problem? > Oh, great work. I'll try tomorrow. > Other recommendations: > - I previously suggested using a

Re: my DNS not resolving

2009-01-29 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On 29-Jan-2009, at 13:49, S. Jeff Cold wrote: BIND List, I have a server running OpenSuse 11.1 with BIND 9.5.0P2-18.1. This server has a dedicated IP address from my ISP. I want this server to resolve my registered domain jatec.us. The server has internet connectivity. If I dig j

Bind 9 query logging

2009-01-29 Thread cod3fr3ak
I am trying to configure query logging on bind 9. Currently I have the following in my configuration file: logging { channel warning_log { file "/var/adm/dns-logs/dns_warnings.log" versions 7 size 2G; severity warning; print-c

my DNS not resolving

2009-01-29 Thread S. Jeff Cold
BIND List, I have a server running OpenSuse 11.1 with BIND 9.5.0P2-18.1. This server has a dedicated IP address from my ISP. I want this server to resolve my registered domain jatec.us. The server has internet connectivity. If I dig jatec.us, I get: xx

referral doubt

2009-01-29 Thread Luis Silva
Hi all, I have a question related with the contacting external servers. If my server receives an referral answer from an external server with 3 NS records but just 1 A additional record, what is the normal behaviour? is the server supposed to resolve all 3 nameservers or continues with the iterativ

RE: wildcarding everything

2009-01-29 Thread Ben Bridges
I found the parking name servers for three domain parking companies, and every one of them returned a bogus address for my company's website (as well as every "major" website that I tried, such as IBM, Cisco, Yahoo, Google, and isc.org). So it certainly appears that they are in fact doing some sor

Re: BIND 9.4.x vs 9.6.x - pid-file check and creation

2009-01-29 Thread Stacey Jonathan Marshall
Mark Andrews wrote: Looking at the publically available parts of SunSolve there are at least bug reports about it. Requires Support Contract tmp_mkdir()/xmemfs_mkdir() inconsistent with other xxxfs_mkdir() functions. | Open in a new window bug 6253984 http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.d

Re: BIND 9.4.x vs 9.6.x - pid-file check and creation

2009-01-29 Thread Jan Arild Lindstrøm
At 16:06 28/01/2009, Thomas Schulz wrote: >In article , >Jan Arild =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lindstr=F8m?= wrote: >> >>Hi, >> >>ah, of course. I did not think about it as a Solaris bug. >> >>I patched BIND 9.6.0-P1 os.c code so it first checks for the diretory >>before it tries the fast approach of just run