hi,
A recursive name server A receives a recursive query from a client,but the
authoritative name server B for the query zone is dead. So name server A return
a server failure answer to the client.
I want to konw if name server A send a query to name server B when another
client ask the
Kevin, this server is totally non-recursive. Neither recurse option is
enabled and packet size does not exceed 512 byte. May be it was some
temporarly bugs due to mysterious causes.
Below I post full sniffer's output for both queries:
No. TimeSourceDestination
On Jun 15 2009, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Jun 13, 2009, at 4:59 AM, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
Is it normal that a validating resolver can't validate a domain it is
authoritative for?
Absolutely. As Alan Clegg wrote not long ago on this list,
You presumably refer to
https://lists.isc.org/pipermai
On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:37 AM, Braebaum, Neil wrote:
What I was getting at - probably worded poorly - was say I wanted to
provide resolution for something like:-
_service._tcp.example.com.
if I'd previously created the DNAME record (example.com.IN
DNAME example2.com.), would cre
Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:37 AM, Braebaum, Neil wrote:
> Now, ignoring that invalid "www" record, the zone above has an apex
> (example.com itself) and then essentially infinite ghostly children. Any
> valid query that lands in that domain (i.e. the qname ends in
> example.com) bu
DNSDigger.com - A massive reverse resolver that lets you dig deeper into the
Net.
DNSDigger.com is a service that lets you get more information about an domain
name. It can show you what other domain names is hosted on a server.
For example can that information be a valuable data for a hosting
In message , Peter
Andreev writes:
> Kevin, this server is totally non-recursive. Neither recurse option is
> enabled and packet size does not exceed 512 byte. May be it was some
> temporarly bugs due to mysterious causes.
I suspect someone has modified the server to mitigate it
Sounds interesting.
How is it different than these?:
http://whois.webhosting.info
http://www.domaintools.com/reverse-ip/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jay Ess
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:19 PM
To:
Hello,
I have setup dynamic dns updates from a cisco router which is handing
out dhcp addresses. In the debug's i'm getting messages that say
REFUSED and SERVFAIL when trying to do a dynamic update.
I'm unsure as to where the problem lies, but I think it might have to
do with the security on the
Can DNSdigger see .GOD? What about .SATAN.
Does DNSdigger see the Peking University on the China National TLD DNS?
What happens if I ask it a question on the domain 北京大学.中国 or the equivalent
ascii IDN of xn--1lq90ic7fzpc.xn--fiqs8s ?
Well I tried digger. I know it does not speak Chinese, Peaki
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Sounds interesting.
>
> How is it different than these?:
> http://whois.webhosting.info
That one is a bit wacky. It tells me the TLD for the Peking University
Domain Name : "xn--1lq90ic7fzpc.xn--fiqs8s" is Invalid! That's a lie. 300
milli
Hello,
I'm trying to setup ddns and the log file is showing that it cannot
create the journal file
16-Jun-2009 22:03:30.145 update: info: client 172.16.56.111#63970:
updating zone 'dan.net/IN': error: journal open failed: unexpected
error
16-Jun-2009 22:03:30.211 update: info: client 172.16.56.1
In message , Dan Le
tkeman writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup ddns and the log file is showing that it cannot
> create the journal file
>
>
> 16-Jun-2009 22:03:30.145 update: info: client 172.16.56.111#63970:
> updating zone 'dan.net/IN': error: journal open failed: unexpected
> error
> 1
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:08 AM, Chris Thompson wrote:
On Jun 15 2009, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Jun 13, 2009, at 4:59 AM, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
Is it normal that a validating resolver can't validate a domain it
is
authoritative for?
Absolutely. As Alan Clegg wrote not long ago on this list,
You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your response -- that explains it. I hope that you don't
mind if I continue this discussion with another question.
I changed my configuration to use views to separate my external zone
(for which BIND is authoritative) from inter
15 matches
Mail list logo
