Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <87ce8771-dd51-47d5-984f-0bc61ebc0...@menandmice.com>, Chris Buxton writes: > On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:27 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > multi-master true; still assumes correct zone serial number > > maintenance. It just prevents the warnings about serial number > > going backwards whic

Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:27 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > multi-master true; still assumes correct zone serial number > maintenance. It just prevents the warnings about serial number > going backwards which is a normal side effect of having multiple > masters vs a master with multiple addresses. OK, wo

Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Chris Buxton writes: > On Nov 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, onix.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD > Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS se > rver to our BIND 9 servers that

Re: BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 17, 2009, at 5:01 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD > Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS > server to our BIND 9 servers that handle recursion. Is there a reliable way > to use m

BIND Secondaries of MS AD Integrated Zones

2009-11-17 Thread jim.sifferle
Hi all, Most of our internal DNS zones are mastered in Microsoft DNS (2k3 R2) as AD Integrated zones. Currently, those zones are slaved from a single MS DNS server to our BIND 9 servers that handle recursion. Is there a reliable way to use multiple masters when slaving AD Integrated zones to

Re: confused wiht the full resolver and stub resolver

2009-11-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <396ef6ed-a5a2-4c55-afd4-496b85278...@menandmice.com>, Chris Buxton writes: > > On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:46 PM, aihua zhang wrote: > > > HI, > > Thanks for your help! Now I'm analysis the lib function > providing by the bind . bind software has three data format:struct > format,

Re: Problema Bind 9.6.1 CentOS 5.3

2009-11-17 Thread Kevin Darcy
Luiz Ricardo Olicio wrote: Hi guys! We have some DNS servers with BIND version 9.6.1-P1 and we have some problems to resolve domain addresses. But to clear the cache (rndc-flush) they return to settle for some time. When the resolution gives error, we have the following message: ;; Connectio

Re: Split view logging?

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 17, 2009, at 7:02 AM, John Horne wrote: > Hello, > > Using BIND 9.5.1, is it possible to configure split view logging - that > is, a separate logging channel/category for different views? I'm trying > to separate out the queries of our local clients from the external ones. No, not using v

Split view logging?

2009-11-17 Thread John Horne
Hello, Using BIND 9.5.1, is it possible to configure split view logging - that is, a separate logging channel/category for different views? I'm trying to separate out the queries of our local clients from the external ones. Thanks, John. -- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0

Re: confused wiht the full resolver and stub resolver

2009-11-17 Thread Chris Buxton
On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:46 PM, aihua zhang wrote: > HI, > Thanks for your help! Now I'm analysis the lib function providing by > the bind . bind software has three data format:struct format, wire format and > the text format, from my understanding, it presents the RR in different three > t