On Dec 5, 2009, at 5:04 AM, Kai Szymanski wrote:
What is the way for the future: Should the browser encode idn's into
punycode and send it to the nameserver (like example below) or should
the browser send the un-encoded idn to the nameserver and the nameserver
have to do the encoding-stuff ?
On Dec 5, 2009, at 6:34 AM, JFC Morfin wrote:
Chris Buxton cbux...@menandmice.com 4 décembre 2009 20:29
The reason IDN support in the BIND query tools (dig, host, nslookup) is not
the default is because it relies on a 3rd party library, which must be
installed and configured by the package
Hello, all.
I have one question about chached information.
If I have example.com domain and let's assume registered like below.
1. root dns
example.com. 3600IN NS ns1.example.com.
3600IN NS ns2.example.com.
but my ns1.example.com
At 06:36 06/12/2009, Danny Mayer wrote:
JFC Morfin wrote:
I wish to set-up my BIND DNS server on window XP as a service. I checked
the automatic start-up. Unfortunately it did not work. The readme1st
guide only says that the way to do it is as usual, what does not help me
since I never did
At 11:00 06/12/2009, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Dec 5, 2009, at 5:04 AM, Kai Szymanski wrote:
What is the way for the future: Should the browser encode idn's into
punycode and send it to the nameserver (like example below) or should
the browser send the un-encoded idn to the nameserver and the
5 matches
Mail list logo
