Chris,
Can one use BIND 9.9 inline signing
with the unsigned version provided by a DLZ interface?
there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to.
Your BIND 9.9 inline signer would AXFR from BIND DLZ without trouble,
but your signer won't be notified by DLZ; you'd have to manually
issue NOTIFY
2012/11/1 Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk:
On Oct 29 2012, Feng He wrote:
于 2012-10-29 9:58, kavin 写道:
Now，I want transfer the zone data from the master dns serverto slave
dns server ,the master dns use bind-dlz+mysql and the slave dns server
use bind+file.
AFAIK, BIND DLZ doesn't send a
In article mailman.564.1351726720.11945.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message 5091adef.1040...@dougbarton.us, Doug Barton writes:
On 10/31/2012 03:56 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
You are equating a practice that was techically wrong, and known
to be wrong
On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:02 AM, Kobus Bensch kben...@fullnet.co.uk wrote:
Thank you for this. Had a look and it seems fairly easy. Not sure if that is
a flippant remark.
As the author of this document, I must say thanks. Deploying DNSSEC is not
hard.
It's the care and feeding after-the-fact
YPYMAYTYP
Zero results from my favorite search engine -- congratulations. ;-)
-JP
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
In article mailman.571.1351768172.11945.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Jan-Piet Mens jpmens@gmail.com wrote:
YPYMAYTYP
Zero results from my favorite search engine -- congratulations. ;-)
Thank you. Try YPYMAYTYC but I was thinking pick.
Sam
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable
Hi
Is that because split horizon doubles admin or because its bad all together?
I have been using split horizon for many years now and found it very useful.
Any thoughts from any on the list would be most welcomed.
Kobus
- Original Message -
From: Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com
To: Kobus
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Kobus Bensch kben...@fullnet.co.uk wrote:
Is that because split horizon doubles admin or because its bad all together?
I have been using split horizon for many years now and found it very useful.
Any thoughts from any on the list would be most welcomed.
Crafted
Feng He fen...@nsbeta.info wrote:
Take a look at:
http://www.dnssec.lk/docs/DNSSEC_in_6_minutes.pdf
I recommend using auto-dnssec maintain so named keeps the zone signed,
instead of dnssec-signzone.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East, veering
Thanks. All makes sense and definitely something to think about in the new
network design.
Also wanted to say, I did like the doc and will be using that, but as you say,
will make particular note about the maintenance side of things.
Thanks
Kobus
- Original Message -
From: Alan Clegg
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
I recommend using auto-dnssec maintain so named keeps the zone signed,
instead of dnssec-signzone.
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this document.
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 |
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
I recommend using auto-dnssec maintain so named keeps the zone signed,
instead of dnssec-signzone.
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this document.
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 |
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
I recommend using auto-dnssec maintain so named keeps the zone signed,
instead of dnssec-signzone.
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this document.
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 |
On Nov 1 2012, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of
this document.
I believe you've mentioned that here before. Several times. Today. ;-)
What I tell you three times is true.”
The Bellman, pp Lewis Carroll
--
Chris Thompson
Email:
On 01/11/12 12:26, Alan Clegg wrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Kobus Bensch kben...@fullnet.co.uk wrote:
Is that because split horizon doubles admin or because its bad all together?
I have been using split horizon for many years now and found it very useful.
Any thoughts from any on the
On Oct 31, 2012, at 4:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/31/2012 03:56 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
You are equating a practice that was techically wrong, and known
to be wrong from the get go, with one that has never been techically
wrong.
Yes, I'm making exactly the same judgment that typical
Should I install bind 9.9.0 first and then update to bind 9.9.1 then update to
bind 9.9.2?
This excerpt from the README file is a little confusing:
BIND 9.9.2
BIND 9.9.2 is a maintenance release and patches the security
flaw described in CVE-2012-4244.
BIND 9.9.1
BIND
You can install 9.9.2 directly.
Doug
On 11/01/2012 01:30 PM, Manson, John wrote:
Should I install bind 9.9.0 first and then update to bind 9.9.1 then
update to bind 9.9.2?
This excerpt from the README file is a little confusing:
BIND 9.9.2
BIND 9.9.2 is a maintenance release
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com wrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
I recommend using auto-dnssec maintain so named keeps the zone signed,
instead of dnssec-signzone.
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of
On 11/1/2012 3:31 PM, Sten Carlsen st...@s-carlsen.dk wrote:
The typical server setup (for own servers) is that one name is used for
setting up e.g. the mail server, the ideal situation for everybody is
that whether I am in house or visiting you, if I have any internet
access, I can read and
On 02/11/12 2:08, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
On 11/1/2012 3:31 PM, Sten Carlsen st...@s-carlsen.dk wrote:
The typical server setup (for own servers) is that one name is used for
setting up e.g. the mail server, the ideal situation for everybody is
that whether I am in house or visiting you, if I
21 matches
Mail list logo
