In article <mailman.564.1351726720.11945.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote:
> In message <5091adef.1040...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes: > > On 10/31/2012 03:56 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > You are equating a practice that was techically wrong, and known > > > to be wrong from the get go, with one that has never been techically > > > wrong. > > > > Yes, I'm making exactly the same judgment that typical users make. "It > > works, so it must be Ok." > > > > The fact that we ("experts") can get away with something, whether it's > > technically right/wrong/indifferent not withstanding, doesn't mean that > > it's good advice for the average user. > > > > Doug > > Putting in delegations where they are not needed introduces additional > work and more places that can go wrong. And also (he said very quietly indeed after delurking) increases the granularity of management. Being able to reload or work on a small (sub)zone rather than a large one can have advantages, which of course have to be balanced with the extra effort involved in setting such a system up. YPYMAYTYP. Sam -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users