On 21 November 2013 02:55, Davis, Donald W donald.da...@unisys.com wrote:
A correction. There is only a single IP address for this server.
You can either put an A record in each zone pointing to the IP address
of the server red or you can put an A record in the primary zone
which the server is a
So does this mean there could be a Kindle edition of it?
Having impulsively snapped up a new Kindle Paperwhite (2nd Gen) for $19 (WiFi
only), when I originally had no plans to do so...since I had only jumped in
on using the first gen Kindle Paperwhite 3G a few months ago (before that I
had a
On 21/11/2013 18:38, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:33:18AM -0800,
jen...@promessage.com wrote:
Seems the question pops up with every bind release; this time I
waited for at least a couple of weeks since the bind release.
Anyone know what's happening with the RPZ2+RRL patches
Thanks for the quick response. dig +noedns did it. Thank you.
On Nov 20, 2013, at 22:09, Evan Hunt e...@isc.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:46:40PM -0500, cypher Nix wrote:
Bind 9.9.x is able to perform zone transfers from the Windows DC
without any issue. Performing a
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, /dev/rob0 wrote:
Chapter 6 is the comprehensive configuration reference. What I'd like
to see is more (and plain-language, consistent) hyperlinking. The
basic idea is that any named.conf setting could be found at an
anchor:
Bv9ARM.ch06.html#that-setting
Yes that
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:33:18AM -0800,
jen...@promessage.com wrote:
Seems the question pops up with every bind release; this time I
waited for at least a couple of weeks since the bind release.
Anyone know what's happening with the RPZ2+RRL patches for bind
9.9.4-P1?
RRL is included
On 21/11/13 14:57, - wrote:
Are others seeing the named process run at 130-180% on RHEL 6? We've
No. Our RHEL6 boxes rune fine.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing
What version of BIND did you have on RHEL5? Does your RHEL6 named get any
better if you try ‘-U #’ (where # is half or less your cpu count)?
_S
On Nov 21, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 21/11/13 14:57, - wrote:
Are others seeing the named process run at
What about the information from top? When comparing RHEL5 and RHEL6 systems,
I would compare the total CPU usage of the server (out of 100% not 2400% or
1600%).
Since the hardware is different, comparing a 16 named threads on a 16 core
box at ???MHz against a 24 core box with 24 named
On 21/11/13 17:30, Sean Channel wrote:
What version of BIND did you have on RHEL5? Does your RHEL6 named get
any better if you try ‘-U #’ (where # is half or less your cpu
count)?
We moved from RHEL5 9.8.3 to RHEL6 9.8.3, and saw no performance change.
We then upgraded through various
Hi,
Seems the question pops up with every bind release; this time I waited
for at least a couple of weeks since the bind release.
Anyone know what's happening with the RPZ2+RRL patches for bind
9.9.4-P1?
I've tried repeatedly to subscribe to the dns firewalls list to ask
this, but never get a
In message 1f415f5e-7623-4e44--0bd394442...@gmail.com, Cipher Nix writes:
Thanks for the quick response. dig +noedns did it. Thank you.
It still should not have resulted in a extra input data.
It would be useful to see the hex dump of the dns message
that triggered the extra input data
In message 1385060190.20266.50452509.48b1a...@webmail.messagingengine.com,
jen...@promessage.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
RRL is included in 9.9.4 already. Deployed and working here.
as specified @
http://ss.vix.su/~vjs/rrlrpz.html
...
BIND9
Phil Mayers wrote the following on 11/21/2013 9:35 AM:
On 21/11/13 14:57, - wrote:
Are others seeing the named process run at 130-180% on RHEL 6? We've
No. Our RHEL6 boxes rune fine.
Fine here as well...
Here is a decently busy CentOS 6 system w/ latest BIND from RPM, 2x Xeon
CPU E5-2640
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:43:40PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:27:59PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
Looking at the HTML source for the Table of Contents, it seems
like someone had this idea before but didn't follow through.
There are numerous links to plain-language
Hi, Mark.
I've also seen the same problem which occurs with AXFR queries
to both Windows server 2003 and 2012:
Win2003
---
;; Got bad packet: extra input data
115 bytes
e9 f3 80 80 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 00 04 6c 61 62 .lab
73 03 68 70 6c 02 68 70 03 63 6f 6d 00 00 fc
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
RRL is included in 9.9.4 already. Deployed and working here.
as specified @
http://ss.vix.su/~vjs/rrlrpz.html
...
BIND9 9.9.4
file rpz2+rl-9.9.4.patch, version 9.9.4-rpz2+rl.13269.14
Version 9.9.4 includes RRL with ./configure
In message 528ec4db.6060...@hpl.hp.com, Andris Kalnozols writes:
Hi, Mark.
I've also seen the same problem which occurs with AXFR queries
to both Windows server 2003 and 2012:
Win2003
---
;; Got bad packet: extra input data
115 bytes
e9 f3 80 80 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 00
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 528ec4db.6060...@hpl.hp.com, Andris Kalnozols writes:
Hi, Mark.
I've also seen the same problem which occurs with AXFR queries
to both Windows server 2003 and 2012:
Win2003
---
;; Got bad packet: extra input data
115 bytes
e9 f3 80 80 00 01 00 01 00 00
19 matches
Mail list logo
