Re: Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-19 Thread @lbutlr
On 19 Oct 2020, at 08:57, Bob McDonald wrote: > When you talk about "putting the .jnl file aside" what are you doing? > Stopping named THEN deleting the .jnl file? I did not delete the file. I stopped named and moved the file, then restarted named. After everything seemed to be working, then I

Re: forwarders used in order or based on RTT ?

2020-10-19 Thread Warren Kumari
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:26 AM Victoria Risk wrote: > > The ARM was updated in 9.16.6. Sorry it took us so long! > > from https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2030 > Forwarders are typically used when an administrator does not wish for > all the servers at a given site to

Re: forwarders used in order or based on RTT ?

2020-10-19 Thread Victoria Risk
The ARM was updated in 9.16.6. Sorry it took us so long! from https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2030 Forwarders are typically used when an administrator does not wish for all the servers at a given site to interact directly with the rest of the Internet. For example, a common

Re: forwarders used in order or based on RTT ?

2020-10-19 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 2:32 PM @lbutlr wrote: > > On 16 Oct 2020, at 08:36, Bob Harold wrote: > > That is certainly not obvious. How do I request improving the manual? > > > > "in turn" would seem to imply "in order", and the order would logically be > > the order I listed them.] > > I

Re: Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-19 Thread @lbutlr
On 19 Oct 2020, at 00:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 18.10.20 11:00, @lbutlr wrote: >> I am getting the following error on one specific domain and I am unsure how >> to fi it. Searching for the error lead to suggestions about not running >> multiple copies of bind on the same machine,

Re: Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 18.10.20 11:00, @lbutlr wrote: I am getting the following error on one specific domain and I am unsure how to fi it. Searching for the error lead to suggestions about not running multiple copies of bind on the same machine, but that is not the case here (and it is only affecting one