Strange named freezing

2021-12-12 Thread Nikita Druba
Hi! My system - OS FreeBSD 12.2 and filesystem - zfs. Samba 4.13.14 runs in a jail with Bind 9.16.23 like backend. Also I have Bind 9.16.23 on another server, its working like secondary dns. Secondary Bind gets zones from DC by transferring with a tsig-key. Also, I have several

Re: ISC-DHCP and BIND 9 DNS: DDNS update fails for /27 subnet P.S.

2021-12-12 Thread Crist Clark
First, for troubleshooting, do not use nslookup(1). If you have BIND, use dig(1) and host(1). Since these names are out there on the Internet, we can troubleshoot too! I'm noticing a problem with the delegation for the 192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa zone. The servers for

Re: ISC-DHCP and BIND 9 DNS: DDNS update fails for /27 subnet P.S.

2021-12-12 Thread Mirsad Goran Todorovac
Hello Crist, I have implemented the recommended changes. It works forward and reverse for the test record, from out domain or others, or for almost all of the test records. There are still some spurious failures, such as this one: 200 IN  CNAME   200.186.198.193.dhcp.slava.alu.hr.

Re: ISC-DHCP and BIND 9 DNS: DDNS update fails for /27 subnet P.S.

2021-12-12 Thread Mirsad Goran Todorovac
Hi Crist, Now the resolution from the problematic record started working again without any change in zones or BIND9 options, also without the server process restart ... :-/ root@domac:~# nslookup -query=any 195.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa. Server: 161.53.235.3 Address:   

Re: ISC-DHCP and BIND 9 DNS: DDNS update fails for /27 subnet

2021-12-12 Thread Mirsad Goran Todorovac
Hi Crist, Thank you for your explanation. It was much appreciated. However, as I previously asserted, it is impossible to know how the system will behave without testing it with real life production load on Monday :-) On 12/11/2021 11:18 PM, Crist Clark wrote: Looks like you're trying to use