## Job (j...@colliniconsulting.it):
> i would please like to have some suggestions to optimize Postgres 8.4
> for a very heavy number of select (with join) queries.
1. PostgreSQL 8.4 has been EOL for over two years. Newer versions do
not only receive bugfixes, but they have improvements in ter
## Doug Barton (do...@dougbarton.us):
> >> If you don't have enough random bits on your system to run these simple
> >> tests, your /dev/random is seriously underpopulated, and likely a
> >> security risk. You should definitely not put BIND in production compiled
> >> with the option you mention a
## Doug Barton (do...@dougbarton.us):
> If you don't have enough random bits on your system to run these simple
> tests, your /dev/random is seriously underpopulated, and likely a
> security risk. You should definitely not put BIND in production compiled
> with the option you mention above.
Ou
## Bruce Dubbs (bruce.du...@gmail.com):
> I've been trying to run the regression tests for bind-9.9.5 and keep
> getting lots of timeouts and errors in the system/inline test.
I saw the same symptoms when packaging/testing bind-9.9.5. I traced
the issue to processes blocking in read() from /dev/
4 matches
Mail list logo
