RE: BIND9 is 25 today!

Huzzah! Original message From: Greg Choules Please raise a beverage of choice and celebrate the 25th birthday of BIND9:commit 7ee52cc7d195433bb8f55972e2a8ab29668f7bceDate: Mon Aug 17 22:05:58 1998 +-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe

Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers

somewhere else you can potentially end up with long, ugly chains of forwarding, even loops. None of stub, static-stub or mirror do this.Just my 2p.GregOn Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 17:38, JW λ John Woodworth wrote:Hi Bob,I've been able to do this with 'forward' zones.  The config would go

RE: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers

Hi Bob,I've been able to do this with 'forward' zones.  The config would go in the resolver but the files would not./John Original message From: Bob McDonald I'm thinking about redesigning an internal DNS environment. To beginwith, all internal DNS zones would reside on

Re: BIND9 Feature Request: inheritance-policy

Thanks Tony!This is essentially what we do today.  In fact, I was ecstatic when acl's were finally able to be used for all address match-lists.However, (and I realize this not a common use case) with over 150,000 zones -- some in multiple views, with different sets of rules (e.g., allow-query,

BIND9 Feature Request: inheritance-policy

Greetings, I would like to request a new feature which I hope will make management of the 'allow' match-lists a tad easier.In short, an option such as 'allow-transfer' in view or zone contexts could extend the match-list as defined in the options section.  This would flow from