;re into
> using curl/wget to forms to their web gui. And tracking their
> "improvements".
>
> Grief like that is why I ended up running my own DNS master server...and
> getting static IP addresses for my central site.
>
> I guess I should point out that the
perform a second dynamic update on a the different name.
>>
>> --
>> Mark Andrews
>>
>>> On 18 Nov 2017, at 04:19, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>>>
>>> I am a bit confused by DNAME's
>>> I had used them before but I may have used them wrong.
>>
I am a bit confused by DNAME's
I had used them before but I may have used them wrong.
On windows 2008r2 I have some zone's where I create a DNAME for the
root and point it to an A record.
IE:
zone bla.bla
SOA
NS
DNAME www.bla.com
where www.bla.com is an A record.
the reason I was doing this
> of apex NS records to the zone). Beyond a certain threshold, you’d want to
> set up a multi-level slaving/NOTIFY hierarchy on the BIND side…
>
>
>
>
> - Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *-----
68.2.1 and 192.168.3.1
in options
notify yes;
also-notify { 192.168.1.1; };
allow-transfer { 192.168.1.1; };
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Jeff Sadowski
wrote:
> I'm going to try slaves like so
>
> If I setup slave zones like so on 192.168.1.1
>
> zone "domainA"
68.2.1 and 192.168.3.1
in options
notify yes;
also-notify { 192.168.1.252; };
allow-transfer { 192.168.1.252; };
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:11 PM, wrote:
> > From: Jeff Sadowski
>
> > On the samba mailing list they described setting up the DC as the NS
> > and forward
should I setup 192.168.1.1 as slaves to these two domains would that fix it?
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Jeff Sadowski
wrote:
> On the samba mailing list they described setting up the DC as the NS and
> forward to another machine for more rules.
> This will work fine for one do
On the samba mailing list they described setting up the DC as the NS and
forward to another machine for more rules.
This will work fine for one domain. Now lets say I have 2 domains.
If I setup forwarders like so on 192.168.1.1
zone "domainA" IN { type forward; forward only; forwarders { 192.168.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
>> In article ,
>> Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>>
>>> I have a number of slave domains that I would like a naming scheme and
>>> not have to go to each
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>
>> I have a number of slave domains that I would like a naming scheme and
>> not have to go to each and change the filename.
>>
>> I have the following zones
&
I have a number of slave domains that I would like a naming scheme and
not have to go to each and change the filename.
I have the following zones
zone "1.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
include "named.slave";
};
zone "2.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
include "named.slave";
};
zone "3.168.192.in-
The other day I found that my secondary name servers running bind
where not dishing out
_msdcs. SRV records
This was causing join issues. It turned out that the Domain controller
had 2 different scopes one for
_msdcs.
and one for
so I shared the second _msdcs. scope with all my bind secondary
P.S. I think that is an outdated method. It should break DNSSEC. Views
from bind would probably be a better way.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Arthur Ramsey
wrote:
> I had to disable DNS ALG on Juniper SRX series firewall.
>
> Thanks for the help,
> Arthur
>
>
> On 03/0
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to setup bind to use an external filtering script to
>> filter out requests?
>
> Have you read the ARM's section on dynamic update policies? The built-in
> facilities
Is there a way to setup bind to use an external filtering script to
filter out requests?
example1: Say I have a cisco dhcp server and some windows clients and
some other clients.
Further lets say I have two domains on my dhcp scope.
WinCli1 is on ad.abc.org
WinCli2 is on ad.xyz.org
Printer1 gets
15 matches
Mail list logo
