Re: Why DNSSEC errors for bund.de?

2011-05-24 Thread Lars Hecking
Chris Thompson writes: We are getting DNSSEC-related SERVFAILs on names in bund.de (e.g. mx1.bind.de). This happens with all of BIND 9.7.3-P1, 9.7.4b1 and 9.8.0-P1 configured with the root and dlv.isc.org trust anchors. However, I can't see what is actually wrong with it, using dig +cd as

Re: RHEL5 BIND in PROD

2011-03-15 Thread Lars Hecking
fakessh @ writes: I recompile the source rpm fedora core 14 bind 9.7.3 to EL4 and EL5 with koji see my blog for explanations http://fakessh.eu/2011/03/10/bind-9-7-3-sur-centos-5-5-depuis-rpm-source-fecora-14/ Yep, that works fine, and even on RHEL3.

Re: Building 9.6.1-P2 for 32-bit Redhat RHEL 5.4

2009-11-28 Thread Lars Hecking
At present I do not have a 32-bit build environment I can try to natively build this on, and was hoping that somebody could suggest how I can get round this problem in the build environment I am using. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock

Re: BIND 9.4-ESVb1 is now available.

2009-11-19 Thread Lars Hecking
Chris Thompson writes: On Nov 19 2009, Mark Andrews wrote: BIND 9.4-ESVb1 is now available. BIND 9.4-ESVb1 is a extended release version beta for BIND 9.4. What's with the strange new version number? How is this different from, say, a 9.4.4b1? (Lots of the changes

bind 9.5 on Solaris dies silently

2009-10-06 Thread Lars Hecking
Hi all, I have made the observation that named sometimes dies silently when I look at the stats web page. Pretty much full logging is enabled, except query logging, but nothing at all is logged in this situation. How could I possibly debug this? statistics-channels { inet * port

Re: bind 9.5 on Solaris dies silently

2009-10-06 Thread Lars Hecking
Milan Jurik writes: [...] If it is silent death at specific time (look at the stats web page) then why not to truss the daemon? Btw. no core file on the system? Thank you (and Andrew) for the suggestion. Unfortunately, the problem seems to be intermittent and I cannot reproduce it at will.

update with no effect

2009-03-30 Thread Lars Hecking
I have started seeing these entries in named.log: 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.467 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.468 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.469 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.470 general: warning: update

Exiting due to early fatal error

2009-02-17 Thread Lars Hecking
BIND 9.4.3-P1, Solaris 8 I'm trying to get a chroot setup to work following the instructions here http://www.boran.com/security/sp/bind9_20010430.html # /usr/sbin/named -g -t /var/named/chroot 17-Feb-2009 12:05:56.789 starting BIND 9.4.3-P1 -g -t /var/named/chroot 17-Feb-2009 12:05:56.790

Re: in-addr.arpa delegation failure

2009-01-21 Thread Lars Hecking
Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: [...] IMHO, you need to go back to the drawing board and, before writing named.conf and zone files, deciding on a general architecture. Who will be the master for 30.172.in-addr.arpa? Who will be authoritative for 30.172.in-addr.arpa? Who will be the master for

in-addr.arpa delegation failure

2009-01-20 Thread Lars Hecking
I've been beating my head against the wall with this issue, and I'm out of ideas: I can't get reverse lookups for a particular, delegated RFC1918 net to work. Setup: Internal root dns.domain.com running bind 9.4.2-P2. This host is set up as a master for 172.30/16. It delegates 172.30 to a

Re: ISC launches new website and mailing list manager

2008-11-18 Thread Lars Hecking
The mailing list conversion requires a little explanation: * The new one-stop page for all the lists under isc.org is https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo Now, can it be configured to strip or reject html rubbish? ___ bind-users mailing