slave-not-updated

address = 212.119.93.5 When I enable the logs for xfer, it doesn't give any clue of problem name server of medun.net.sa. Is there any way to troubleshoot from the master server why there is no synchnization to one more Slave. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Mohammed Ejaz Asst. Oper

cyberia.net.sa

I am using bind I have problem in resolving my domain cyberia.net.sa over the internet. Whereas it is working fine internally. Any clue would be highly appeicated. Thanks, Mohammed Ejaz Asst. Operation Director of Systems. Cyberia SAUDI ARABIA P.O.Box: 301079, Riyadh 11372 Phone: (+966

RE: DNS-Format-Eroor

address, probably easier to do in a firewall with a temporary rule. On 18/12/2017 14:54, Mohammed Ejaz wrote: Thank you for the detail explanation really appreciated . We have asked by our National cyber Security Center to investigate on this, as they have detected massive malici

RE: DNS-Format-Eroor

n anonymous - which suggests they have something to hide. I don't get the vibe that this domain is owned by a child or someone who needs protection from the evilness of the Internet... On 18/12/2017 11:26, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 18.12.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Moha

DNS-Format-Eroor

ing ns2.mumbai-m.site/: reply has no answer Dec 17 09:58:41 ns20 named[1530]: DNS format error from 46.105.221.247#53 resolv ing ns1.mumbai-m.site/: reply has no answer Thanks, Mohammed Ejaz Asst. Operation Director of

RE: unable-resolving (Mohammed Ejaz)

users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of G.W. Haywood Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 1:41 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: unable-resolving (Mohammed Ejaz) Hi there, > ... we have been receiving complain from our customer that they are > unable to open the websites when they use

RE: unable-resolving

Dear all. This lately we have been receiving complain from our customer that they are unable to open the websites when they use our DNS server (ns1.cyberia.net.sa) , one of the Eg. Is www.twitter.com, it works only If I removed my internal cache it works for some time. And after some time it

RE: can't-resolve

yes, true the problem is from the firewall. Thanks everyone for the tremendous support. Ejaz From: Warren Kumari [mailto:war...@kumari.net] Sent: Sunday, January 4, 2015 5:09 PM To: Mohammed Ejaz Cc: Barry Margolin; comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org Subject: Re: can't-resolve

RE: can't-resolve

rything is fine. It wouldn't have worked with this IP if there is firewall on the box?? Regards, Mohammed Ejaz CYBERIAR SAUDI ARABIA P.O.Box 301079, Riyadh 11372, Saudi Arabia Tel: +966 11 464 7114 Ext. 140 Fax: +966 11 465 4735 -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@list

RE: can't-resolve

ind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Steven Carr Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 5:54 PM To: Bind users Subject: Re: can't-resolve On 25 December 2014 at 14:50, Mohammed Ejaz wrote: > I wanted tell you one more thing when I reassign my old IP which is > 212.119.64.12 then everything w

RE: can't-resolve

ecember 25, 2014 12:29 PM To: Bind users Subject: Re: can't-resolve On 25 December 2014 at 08:05, Mohammed Ejaz wrote: > logging { > > channel querylog{ > > file "/var/log/querylog"; > severity debug 10; >

RE: can't-resolve

Thank you for prompt support really appreciate. my /etc/named.conf, see recursion are enabled. still I can resolve the yahoo.com or any outside domains. = > set debug > yahoo.com Server: 212.119.64.228 Address:212.119.64.228#53

RE: can't-resolve

c.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Steven Carr Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 4:54 PM To: Bind users Subject: Re: can't-resolve On 24 December 2014 at 13:42, Mohammed Ejaz wrote: > Any clue would be highly appreciated. thanks in advance. What's the

can't-resolve

hello, I cannot resolve the external domain when I change my name server IP.I am sure for the new IP (which I am replacing with existing IP) the port 53 udp and TCP is enabled for publically. also modifying in the named.conf in the listening section such as " listen-on port 53

tsig-key

I have info blox DNS appliance and slave is BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4, now the problem is "Zone transfer wont happening" when I am enabling Tsig key at master server of infoblox. It gives you the error like " client request has invalid signature tsig tranfer: tisg verify f

RE: No-Sync-at-Slave

Thank you so much for your immediate answer, I wanted know how did you check as 212.93.192.4 configured only on UDP? -Original Message- From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org] Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 10:33 AM To: Mohammed Ejaz Cc: bind-us...@isc.org Subject: Re: No-Sync-at-Slave

No-Sync-at-Slave

I have a primary and secondary name server which host a number of domains. Recently, the secondary has started failing to sync one of the domains, and comes up with the following May 7 22:51:12 ns2 named[1381]: [ID 873579 daemon.error] transfer of 'domain.com/IN' from 212.93.192.4#53:

re-enalbe subscribtion

Please all ignore this message, Thanks Ejaz ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

DNSSEC-deployment

Hi, Since we are one of the leading ISP and Domain service provider in the KSA,, in our DNS we have about 1000 domains are hosted, Now actually my concern is regarding the DNSSEC deployment, Since I went through with several articles, stating that it is not that much needed for the small

RE: third dns server

Many thanks Ejaz -Original Message- From: ma...@isc.org [mailto:ma...@isc.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:42 AM To: Mohammed Ejaz Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: third dns server In message , "Mohammed Ejaz" writes: > > We have been receiving compla

third dns server

We have been receiving complain by our client, during the primary DNS servers are down that is ns1.xyz and ns2.xyz is down. And as per the configuration at saudinic.net.sa (domain Registrar Company) we were expecting that during the outage of primary name servers then ns3.abc will handle all the re

new version of bind

Hi, I am sysadmin of one of the leading ISPs of Saudi Arabia, I am going to upgrade the bind which is from BIND 9.3.4-P1 to the latest one, so please can any one confirm that the latest BIND 9.6.0-P1 can be helpful in ISP's environment. As I have experienced some issues earlier when I installe

RE: Failover

TTL. Philippe _ From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mohammed Ejaz Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 8:11 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Failover Hi all, Can it be possible through the bind, www records

Failover

Hi all, Can it be possible through the bind, www records should work as failover, I mean during the primary record unavailable and then it should go for next www only, Pls. note that I don't want let they work as round robin function. 1. Primary www record pointing 1.2.3.4 as long as it i

IP redirection

Dear all, It can be done through the bind, Let say if any one trying to browse a website by the IP address then DNS redirect him to the domain Eg: http:///1.2.3.4 it should be redirected to http://abc.com Regards Ejaz _