On Dec 15 2011, Kevin Darcy wrote:
To settle the question of "are 2 nameservers required by the RFCs?", I'm
surprised you guys missed this text in RFC 1034, Section 4.1:
A given zone will be available from several name servers to insure
its availability in spite of host or communication
To settle the question of "are 2 nameservers required by the RFCs?", I'm
surprised you guys missed this text in RFC 1034, Section 4.1:
A given zone will be available from several name servers to insure
its availability in spite of host or communication link failure. By
administrative fi
bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Re: .TLD minimum number of nameservers rule
>
> What IS the problem, exactly? You're describing two things that
> doesn't seem to be related: number of NS for a zone, and PTR/DNAME
> records.
My appologies if in an attempt to be succint, I fa
It does not seem clear to me if you mix the internal network and the
external network with regards to the 2 server requirement. Everything
inside your own NAT is your own responsibility - you can use any number
of DNS servers you like - 0, 1, 10, n.
For the rest of the world to see, two servers ar
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:53 PM, wrote:
>> > For instance, would this be a problem when implementing a
>> > wide area bonjour subdomain using my own local dns server for clients that
>> > are
>> > mobile (internal/external) ?
>>
>> Bonjour should work even without a DNS server.
>
> Reminds me of
>
> What IS the problem, exactly? You're describing two things that
> doesn't seem to be related: number of NS for a zone, and PTR/DNAME
> records.
My appologies if in an attempt to be succint, I failed to be clear.
>
> If you don't "own" an IP address, then usually you don't need to
> bother a
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:20 AM, wrote:
> Thanks all. Chris, Anand that's very useful to know, sorry Jeff and Philippe,
> your interesting suggestions wont work in this case.
>
> If I attack the problem from the other way down instead, the fact my current
> registra doesn't allow me to add PTR or
Thanks all. Chris, Anand that's very useful to know, sorry Jeff and Philippe,
your interesting suggestions wont work in this case.
If I attack the problem from the other way down instead, the fact my current
registra doesn't allow me to add PTR or DNAME records to my top level domain
limits what e
On Dec 12 2011, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
I suspect that most, if not all registries will require you to provide
at least 2 name servers, because this is highly recommended in one of
the RFCs (forget which one now).
This seems to go right back to RFC 882 (November 1983):
| The domain must provide
erver.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Anand Buddhdev
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 9:32 AM
To: nudge...@fastmail.fm
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: .TLD minimum numb
On 12/12/2011 15:19, nudge...@fastmail.fm wrote:
> Sorry if this is slightly off-topic
>
> I've just discovered that the TLD where I've registered my domain requires a
> minimum of 2 nameservers
> for any subdomain, which is very sensible but I happen to have a special case
> on my hands.
> So
Sorry if this is slightly off-topic
I've just discovered that the TLD where I've registered my domain requires a
minimum of 2 nameservers
for any subdomain, which is very sensible but I happen to have a special case
on my hands.
So I'd like to register a new domain elsewhere where they will all
12 matches
Mail list logo
